- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:24:15 -0400
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Yeah, Brian pointed that out.
--Frank
pat hayes wrote:
>
> >I had an action
> >
> > ACTION 20030425#4 frank figure out the cost to PRIMER of accepting timbl-03
> >
> >
> >The way the Primer is currently written, readers would probably
> >conclude that the graph generated from a parseType Collection would
> >necessarily include the "redundant" rdf:type triples Tim objects to,
> >and it wouldn't be clear that they could be omitted (e.g., if
> >someone were to write RDF/XML to describe the triples directly,
> >rather than using parseType Collection. So some additional
> >explanation would be required, but I don't think it would be
> >extensive or complicated.
> >
> >However, one thing I'd need some clarification on (in writing that
> >explanation) is whether it is true, as Tim suggested in his original
> >comment, that
> >
> >"It is trivial to restore the triples for anyone who wants them fro a
> >graph without them, using
> >{ ?x rdf:first ?y } => { ?x a rdf:List }."
> >
> >Or rather, whether this is true *in RDF* (as opposed to in OWL).
>
> Actually it is true in RDFS, since it follows (in RDFS) from
>
> rdf:first rdfs:domain rdf:List .
>
> Pat
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
> FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell
> phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
> s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
--
Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Monday, 5 May 2003 16:24:27 UTC