- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:24:15 -0400
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Yeah, Brian pointed that out. --Frank pat hayes wrote: > > >I had an action > > > > ACTION 20030425#4 frank figure out the cost to PRIMER of accepting timbl-03 > > > > > >The way the Primer is currently written, readers would probably > >conclude that the graph generated from a parseType Collection would > >necessarily include the "redundant" rdf:type triples Tim objects to, > >and it wouldn't be clear that they could be omitted (e.g., if > >someone were to write RDF/XML to describe the triples directly, > >rather than using parseType Collection. So some additional > >explanation would be required, but I don't think it would be > >extensive or complicated. > > > >However, one thing I'd need some clarification on (in writing that > >explanation) is whether it is true, as Tim suggested in his original > >comment, that > > > >"It is trivial to restore the triples for anyone who wants them fro a > >graph without them, using > >{ ?x rdf:first ?y } => { ?x a rdf:List }." > > > >Or rather, whether this is true *in RDF* (as opposed to in OWL). > > Actually it is true in RDFS, since it follows (in RDFS) from > > rdf:first rdfs:domain rdf:List . > > Pat > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell > phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes > s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Monday, 5 May 2003 16:24:27 UTC