- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:38:47 +0100
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sorry unclear again .. :( > > There is a small substantive differences which is Unicode Normal Form C. > > ? NFC changed? No - the I18N lot decided that IRIs which are not in NFC are OK. So the namespaces 1.1 defn of IRI which does not mention NFC is closer to I18N's ideal than my text which does. Jeremy > > > On the advice of I18N WG in Cannes we required RDF URI > References to be in > > Unicode NFC; Martin D|rst informs me that they have changed > their minds on > > this one. > > What exactly changed? I couldn't find any reference to such a change > in the 3rd IRI internet draft linked from the i18n resources > area http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/ in > > Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs), draft-duerst-iri-03 > March 2, 2003 > http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri-03.txt > > > Dave >
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 09:38:44 UTC