- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:20:32 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>This smells like a contradiction to me... > >At 17:17 11/03/2003 -0600, you wrote: >>ex:Mary ex:had ex:littleLamb . >> >>a girl or a uriref (respectively de dicto or de re) ? > >this seems to say the use of ex:Mary in a reification is: > a girl is the 'de dicto' view? > a uri is the 'de re' view? No, sorry, I got it backwards. Mary is de re, 'ex:Mary' is de dicto. Pat >but later... > >>These two choices are independent, but each influences the >>significance of the other. >> >>Currently, the semantics document recommends that one should >>interpret this vocabulary so that aaa is interpreted as a stating, >>ie referring to a concrete occurrence of a triple rather than an >>abstract form; and that bbb should be interpreted de re, ie as >>referring to Mary rather than to Mary's URIref. > >... 'de re' refers to Mary, so (by assumed elimination) 'de dicto' >refers to the uri. > >Am I missing something here? > >#g > > >------------------- >Graham Klyne ><GK@NineByNine.org> >PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 12:20:16 UTC