- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 27 Jun 2003 11:44:08 +0100
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 23:44, pat hayes wrote: [...] > > > >If so, then Owl want a stronger notion of subClassOf than that proposed > >in this document for rdfs:subClassOf. > > It will want to impose stronger conditions on the meaning of that term, yes. I had my stronger/weaker notions mixed up apparently. I had taken stronger to mean more restrictive, i.e. that c1 owl:subClassOf c2 |= c1 rdfs:subClassOf c2 But that isn't the case, right? Brian
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 06:45:32 UTC