Re: owl:subClassOf ? [was: Re: working on it]

On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 18:42, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> > Would that meant that the 'correct' thing for WEBONT to do would be to
> > define owl:subClassOf as a subproperty of rdfs:subClassOf?
> 
> 
> superproperty

I must be dumb.  I thought the owl notion was more restrictive, i.e.

owl:subClassOf is a subset of rdfs:subClassOf but not the other way
round.

You are saying owl:subClassOf can have a member <c1, c2> that is not a
member of rdfs:subClassOf?

Brian

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:55:29 UTC