- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 26 Jun 2003 18:52:51 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 18:42, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Would that meant that the 'correct' thing for WEBONT to do would be to > > define owl:subClassOf as a subproperty of rdfs:subClassOf? > > > superproperty I must be dumb. I thought the owl notion was more restrictive, i.e. owl:subClassOf is a subset of rdfs:subClassOf but not the other way round. You are saying owl:subClassOf can have a member <c1, c2> that is not a member of rdfs:subClassOf? Brian
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:55:29 UTC