- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 23 Jun 2003 12:51:13 +0100
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
-----Forwarded Message----- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl> To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: inadequate reference in Owl REF Date: 22 Jun 2003 15:42:57 +0100 From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0102.html > Owl Reference contains: > > [[ > The following datatypes are NOT recommended for use in OWL (see for > details the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax document [OWL S&AS]): > ]] > > I just hunted around S&AS and couldn't find these details. Please > include a more specific reference, preferably a hiperlink. > > Brian Brian, Thanks for your comment. In the post-LC editor's drafts this discussion on recommended datatypes has been moved from OWL S&AS to the RDF Semantics document. We suggest the OWL Reference document simply lists the recommended datatypes and points for further details to the relevant section of the RDF Semantics document. The link to RDF Semantics currently is: http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_append.html#dtype_interp but this will be updated at some appropriate later point in time. Please let us know, cc-ing public-webont-comments@w3.org, whether this response is satisfactory. Guus Schreiber -- Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 07:53:12 UTC