W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Semantics review: body

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:20:15 +0300
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200306191120.15826.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

"Datatype clashes and assertions that ill-typed literals are of type 
rdfs:Literal are the only inconsistencies recognized by this model theory. "

are you sure - this sentence looks like a hostage to fortune, but I tend to 
agree with it.

Peter has pointed out the possibility of a datatype with empty value space - 
lets suppose we have one identified by eg:broken .


<eg:a> rdf:type <eg:broken> .

is a contradiction, but is only a datatype clash with a rather generous 
reading of 'disjointness' in the defn of datatype clash.

I cannot see any other problems with empty datatypes - although the closure 
rules for datatypes are incomplete, but that is too difficult to fix.

Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 05:20:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:23 UTC