- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:05:12 +0300
- To: gk@ninebynibe.org, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Graham, Pat, Patrick, Readiong the minutes of the 2nd May I see that I was meant to discuss with you the text in msg http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0368 I believe the major concern was with the first sentence, and that Pat was going to suggest a rewording to broaden it. I have currently put the text as is in the editors draft at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-Datatypes Patrick suggested: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0006.html "The datatype abstraction used in RDF is compatible with XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes..." as the first sentence, which is certainly an improvement. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 17:05:27 UTC