Re: Cut back RDFCore semantics doc

* Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2003-06-17 16:59-0400]
> * Ramanathan Guha <rguha@us.ibm.com> [2003-06-17 13:24-0700]
> > Can't we have a non-normative W3C Note that we refer to from the normative 
> > document?
> 
> I would be happy with that. Bugfixing the closure rules is slowing down 
> the RECification of the main Semantics doc. The closure rules are interesting 
> enough to deserve their own doc, and would be no less useful as a Note.

Hmm re-reading what I just sent, I'm not quite sure what 'no less useful' means, 
but you get the idea. Closure rules good. Note good. Time short, WG needs to finish...

> Dan