- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 16 Jun 2003 13:55:03 +0100
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Roland Schwaenzl <Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
I think we are getting to the point where responses to questions like this should refer to the text of the spec, with no adornment. Brian On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 16:48, pat hayes wrote: > Is it legal to include XML markup inside non-XMLLiteral literal > strings? For example, suppose I wanted to define a datatype called > ex:XMLnumber whose lexical space was all strings of the form > > <xmlnum>English-number-phrase</xmlnum> > > and whose L2V mapping looked like > > <xmlnum>one</xmlnum> --> 1 > <xmlnum>two</xmlnum> --> 2 > ... > <xmlnum>three hundred and ninety seven</xmlnum> --> 397 > .... > > and write literals like > > "<xmlnum>three hundred and ninety seven</xmlnum>"^^ex:XMLnumber > > to refer to 397, would that be legal RDF? There are no semantic > reasons to exclude it. > > Pat > > PS> This information has been requested by Roland and I don't know the answer.
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 08:55:25 UTC