- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:14:22 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dave Beckett wrote: > I don't recall seeing another XML specification that says much, if > anything, about XML names starting with 'xml' either, they assume you > can read the XML specifications and take it's description that these > as reserved and use that. > > > So I guess, in terms of proposals. We can either: > > 1) continue to say nothing, the XML specification is sufficient. > My preference. > 3) Explicitly allow them. Maybe people do want to do: > <xml:lang>en</xml:lang> > or things like that? > > with the same test above but with 2 triples, the second: > <http://example.org/thing> <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespacefoo> "xyzzy". > > FYI, I see the W3C RDF Validator/ARP2 does #3. > > Dave > > That's a bug. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 11:14:46 UTC