Re: qu-03

Looks great.  Please send asap.

Brian

On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 04:19, pat hayes wrote:
> > Pat,
> > 
> > How is the response to this coming along?
> > 
> > Brian
> 
> 
> Sorry this got lost. Draft response follows:
> 
> --------
> 
> Dear Qu
> 
> In
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0267.html
> you made a comment which was subsequently clarified in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0318.html
> and archived as a formal comment Qu-03:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#qu-03
> 
> We have been treating this issue as similar to the one raised by Jeff
> Pan, archived as pan-01:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pan-01
> 
> since they both requested that RDF be described in terms of a layered
> sublanguage.
> 
> After discussion, the WG has resolved that to attempt
> to define such a proper sub-language is beyond our charter and our
> timescale. However, we have resolved
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-layered-subset
> 
> that this issue should be classified as postponed, meaning that it
> will be on the agenda of any WG which considers RDF in the future.
> This recognizes that the issue needs to be addressed eventually.
> 
> Please let us know if this response is acceptable, CCing
> www-rdf-comments@w3.org.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC       (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.      (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola               (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32501                  (850)291 0667    cell
> phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 

Received on Thursday, 31 July 2003 06:51:17 UTC