W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 31 Jul 2003 10:59:29 +0100
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1059645569.2457.9.camel@dhcp-91-3.hpl.hp.com>

On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 10:37, Graham Klyne wrote:


> and the axiomatic triple:
> (2)  rdf:type rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource .


> QED (this time?)

No.  This requires RDFS.

> ...
> Or, more informally, I think that although IP and IR may be disjoint in 
> RDF-interpretations, where there is no available vocabulary for this to be 
> visible or otherwise in an RDF expression, the semantic conditions on RDFS 
> interpretation require that IP be a subset of IR.

The question was about RDF entailment.  Pat states that my test
entailment, which just uses RDF vocabulary, holds in RDF.  I think you
are now saying that it doesn't.


ps: sorry if you get some duplicate emails.  Evolution giving me more
hassle this morning.

Received on Thursday, 31 July 2003 06:02:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:24 UTC