- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:51:03 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- CC: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Graham Klyne wrote: > > At 14:08 28/07/03 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > >> Someone (Brian) suggested: >> >> >>> _:a rdf:label "\u0007" . >>> >>>> entails? >>> >>> >>> _:a rdf:label _:v . >>> _:v rdf:type xsd:string . >> >> >> >> I think not. >> (IIRC xsd:string is restricted to the characters matching the xml 1.0 >> Char production, and bel is not one of them). > > > Hmmm: how about: > > _:a rdf:label "\u0007" . > > RDFS-entails? > > _:a rdf:label _:v . > _:v rdf:type rdfs:Literal . > Yes that one is OK.
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 15:51:42 UTC