- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 18:23:20 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: phayes@ihmc.us, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
At 11:18 03/07/04 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >I would also point out that many members of RDF Core can point to similar >commitments to I18N issues; RDF Core has consistently come to I18N for >advice; we have studied and taken heed of charmod; there has been much >support and little resistance to support for I18N issues. Acknowledged. It worked well for a long time. >RDF developers have already deployed NFC checking code, whereas XML >developers are resisting the NFC constraints in XML 1.1 Very nice to hear. Can you give us pointers? By the way, you may be interested in looking at http://www.w3.org/2003/06/xml1.1test/Overview.html. I might also take this opportunity to point out that working on the basics of the character model (since RFC 2070) and on normalization go very much in line with the idea to reduce the number of different constructs representing one and the same textual artefact. Regards, Martin.
Received on Sunday, 27 July 2003 22:13:07 UTC