- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 05:28:08 +0100
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- CC: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, "w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. \\ Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Rich Salz wrote: > And, by the way, shouldn't we all be using exc-c14n instead of c14n > whenever possible? Why? (My analysis let the RDF group to make this decision [exc-c14n], but it seemed to depend on aspects of our application. In particular the problem of namespaces that are used but not so visibly so, seems to be a reasonable argument for using c14n rather than exc-c14n). Jeremy
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 00:29:04 UTC