W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 05:28:08 +0100
Message-ID: <3F20B1D8.9020501@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
CC: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, "w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. \\ Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

Rich Salz wrote:

> And, by the way, shouldn't we all be using exc-c14n instead of c14n
> whenever possible?


(My analysis let the RDF group to make this decision [exc-c14n], but it 
seemed to depend on aspects of our application. In particular the problem 
of namespaces that are used but not so visibly so, seems to be a reasonable 
argument for using c14n rather than exc-c14n).

Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 00:29:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:24 UTC