- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:47:42 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:54:14 +0300 Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> wrote: > > > I have done the changes as suggested by Dave > I have not rebuilt the mega manifest. I have just done this. > I also obsoleted bagID 007 > rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test007 > where at least the comment is not true. > > > jjc: > > 2) rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/Manifest.rdf#test006 > > 3) rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/Manifest.rdf#test0002 > > dave: > > 2 - yes, obsolete > > > > 3 - is testing containers. The rdf:bagID could just > > be removed from the rdf:Bag and the N-Triples corrected. > > I take that to be the other way round - I obsoleted 3 and changed 2. Yes. I've checked all your changes in software now, I found a couple of problems: Jan or you missed one which I've just edited: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/Manifest.rdf#test003 is now obsoleted Jeremy: You obsoleted rdf-charmod-literals/Manifest.rdf#test001 instead of rdf-charmod-literals/Manifest.rdf#error001 so I've corrected that. (plus I changed the wording in the comments on rdfms-xmllang/test002.rdf) The current state looks good. Dave
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 16:48:09 UTC