- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 24 Jul 2003 15:14:44 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, i18n <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 20:43, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > My latest attempt, I guess this will need one more go :( or just: [[ Note: see RDF Primer [@@ref] for a discussion of representing text in an RDF literal. ]] > > Taking some of Graham's ideas (but not all). > (I dropped the term "mixed content XHTML" because it is not (to my knowledge) > an accepted term of the art - "XML mixed content" is a sequence of text nodes > and element nodes, so I hoped this was clear, but it is probably safer to > avoid it). > > [[ > For text that may contain markup, use typed literals with type rdf:XMLLiteral. > If language annotation is required, it must be explicitly included as markup, > usually by means of an xml:lang attribute. [XHTML] may be included within RDF > in this way. Sometimes, in this latter case, an additional span or div > element is needed to carry an xml:lang or lang attribute. > ]] > > Jeremy >
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 10:20:12 UTC