- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 24 Jul 2003 12:15:44 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, i18n <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, connolly@w3.org
Hi Martin, Whilst this is a continuation of a previous conversation, as I'm including the archive, I've dropped the context and am starting afresh. I understand that I18N have concerns about the current RDFCore design for literals. I have recently sent an argument [1] to I18N that I hope will persuade you to support the current design. Whilst I am happy to discuss this issue with you personally at any time, I would appreciate the opportunity to hear feedback from the rest of I18N directly, and to address any questions they might have. I understand you may be considering raising a formal objection. I think it would be best to meet with I18N before that decision is taken, and further, I think it would help my understanding to observe the process of taking that decision. Brian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0238.html
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 07:16:20 UTC