Re: important: RDF Implementation status

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
>
> I assume we shold be looking at
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest.rdf
> for the tests to run.
>
> I have just updated the xml-sch-02 tex-01 and horst-01 Manifests as
> actioned last week. Please can someone rebuild the big Manifest.

Doing this tomorrow first thing.

>
> Jeremy
>
> Eric Miller wrote:
>
> >
> > Working group member developers,
> >
> > We are in the process of assessing RDF implementation for drafting a
> > directors decision and we need your help.
> >
> > Please run your code base against the test cases [1] and report your
> > finding to w3c-rdf-comments as soon as possible. We need this in the
> > next week.  Please include in your finding the toolkit name and
> > description. Describing your toolkits in RDF gets you bonus points :) [2]
> >
> > Please feel free to forward this request to other developers who are
> > working on RDF toolkits.
> >
> > thanks for all of your help,
> >
> > --eric
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/EO/usecases/tools
> >
>
>
>
>

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Theory and practice _are_ the same thing. In theory.

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 17:46:28 UTC