Re: semantics editors draft

July 15th version uploaded to

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/

I only moved the html - assumed the figures hadn't changed.  Pat?

Brian

pat hayes wrote:
> 
> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html
> 
> now embodies the weakened RDF semantic conditions we decided on last 
> Friday and has complete sets of entailment (nee 'closure') rules plus 
> proofs of the various lemmas. It also has a lot more internal links from 
> technical vocabulary to definitions, and passes the W3C validators. .
> 
> There is still one issue that we may need to discuss, concerning the 
> status of 'strings'. I have linked to the relevant pieces of text in the 
> change list notes. Apart from this, and obvious finishing-off edits such 
> as getting the title right and suppressing all the red highlighting 
> (redefine 'newstuff' in the header), I think this is now ready to go.
> 
> Pat
> 

Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 17:04:15 UTC