Re: syntax review (points for Dave, Eric, Brian)

At 12:46 14/07/03 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
>Yes, that does read a bit odd.  Suggestion
>
>FROM:
>     The construction of RDF URI references from XML attributes can
>     generate the same RDF URI references from different XML
>     attributes.  This can cause ambiguity in the grammar when
>     matching attribute events (such as when rdf:about and about XML
>     attributes are both present).  Documents that have this are illegal.
>
>TO:
>     Different XML attribute events can generate the same RDF URI
>     reference.  This can cause ambiguity in the grammar when matching
>     attribute events such as both when rdf:about and about XML
>     attributes are present.  Documents that have both the namespaced
>     and non-namespaced attribute on the same element are illegal.
>
>(I'm not making this change yet, just offering it)

I think the proposed revision is much better, and as far as I can tell does 
not change the intended meaning.

#g



-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E

Received on Monday, 14 July 2003 13:51:50 UTC