RE: XML observation

Graham Klyne wrote:

> (Hmmm... general W3C process point:
> given I18N is regarded as so fundamental, I think the purpose would
> be better served by having I18N *participation* from the beginning,
> or at the beginning, not occasional reviews later in the process.)

In the beginning was the RDF M&S spec.  And lo and behold, there was 
I18N participation.

Misha




--------------------------------------------------------------- -
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2003 13:08:08 UTC