- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 22:03:30 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, duerst@w3.org
Two minor corrections only. Brian McBride wrote: > 2. RDFCore agrees with last call feedback that it received, that That was actually first call feedback on the abstract syntax. > building an XML specific mechanism into its core model is architecturaly > inappropriate - it mixes things that should be independent. Accepting > this implies that parseType="Literal" values must use one of the > existing mechanisms - i.e. either plain literals or typed literals, or a > new more general mechanism must be invented, e.g. a new triple > structure. An XML specific mechanism is undesirable. > > 4. Taking the datatype approach creates the opportunity to subclass the > datatype XMLLiteral, so that the value of a property may be restricted > to a specific form of XML Literal, possibly specified using XML Schema. This would be a future extension ... could I suggest adding the word 'future' into this point, on its next iteration.
Received on Sunday, 6 July 2003 17:04:10 UTC