- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 17:01:47 -0400
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- CC: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Brian_McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, ext pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Martin Duerst wrote: > > Hello Patrick, > > At 13:39 03/07/03 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: > snip > >> Our specs are very clear about the non-relevance of xml:lang scope >> on XML literals insofar as the semantics of *RDF* (not *XML*) are >> concerned. XML semantics only is relevant to an RDF parser. >> End of story. *RDF* users (as opposed to *XML* >> users) will be aware of this (if they've read even the primer) and should >> act accordingly. > > > Well, and assuming the primer actually gets around to talk about > parseType="Literal" :-(. > The volume of mail on this subject (both this time around and prior times around) strikes me as an excellent reason why the Primer doesn't talk about parseType="Literal". On the other hand, it probably should, so if you folks would like to come up with a paragraph or so that everyone would agree with, I'd be happy to include it. --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 16:42:18 UTC