Friday, 1 August 2003
Thursday, 31 July 2003
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: xml literal lex space question
- Re: xml literal lex space question
- Re: RDF Use Case: scraping metadata from the web
- Re: RDF Use Case: scraping metadata from the web
- Re: xml literal lex space question
- Re: Status of N-triples
- RE: RDF Use Case: scraping metadata from the web
- RDF Use Case: scraping metadata from the web
Wednesday, 30 July 2003
Thursday, 31 July 2003
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- xml literal lex space question
- Re: Review of RDF primer Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003
- Re: Status of N-triples
- Re: Review of RDF primer Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Review of RDF primer Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003
- Re: Review of RDF primer Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: qu-03
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Review of RDF primer Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003
- weekly call for agenda items
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: qu-03
Wednesday, 30 July 2003
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: Review of RDF primer Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003
- Re: Properties no longer required to be resources?
- Review of RDF primer Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003
- Re: semantics update
- qu-03
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Properties no longer required to be resources?
- rdf:dataType="&rdf;XMLLiteral" (was: Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
- Re: semantics update
- I18N telecon
- Re: semantics update
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: semantics update
Tuesday, 29 July 2003
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- RE: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: quick syntax question.
- My actions from 2003-07-25 telecon
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Macintosh file type for RDF/XML
- Re: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- 2003-07-25 rdfcore minutes (draft)
- Re: semantics update
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: semantics update
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: semantics update
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: XML observation
- semantics update
- Re: Review of RDF semantics editor's draft July 15 2003
Monday, 28 July 2003
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: OOPS: (was: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: Syntax document
- Re: Syntax document
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- RE: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Syntax document
- Actions from last telecon?
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: OOPS: (was: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
- Status of N-triples
- completing disposition of semantics comments
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- RE: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: OOPS: (was: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: OOPS: (was: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: regrets this friday 1st August
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- RE: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: quick syntax question.
- RE: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- OOPS: (was: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
- RE: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- RE: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: quick syntax question.
- RE: Regrets for Aug 1st
- Regrets for August
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: Regrets for Aug 1st
- Re: quick syntax question.
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Regrets for Aug 1st
- regrets this friday 1st August
- Re: Concepts: URI references
Sunday, 27 July 2003
- Re: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- quick syntax question.
Friday, 25 July 2003
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Concepts: URI references
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- RE: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- Re: [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- [Fwd: Jena semantic tests]
- XML characters and literals
- Re: proposal to close Qu-03
- regrets for today's telecon
- catching cold, up
- Re: take 2: primer text for parseType="Literal"
- Re: preliminary agenda for telecon
- Concepts editor's draft synch with Primer
- Re: take 2: primer text for parseType="Literal"
- Re: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
- preliminary agenda for telecon
- anti-regrets
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Re: take 2: primer text for parseType="Literal"
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- possible regrets
- RE: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
Thursday, 24 July 2003
- RE: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Re: test failures
- Re: test failures
- RE: Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Request for clarification on Canonical XML
- Re: take 2: primer text for parseType="Literal"
- Re: REPEAT: RDF Plain Literals and xsd:string
- Re: test failures
- RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
- Re: Review of RDF semantics editor's draft July 15 2003
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: important: RDF Implementation status
- RE: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- RE: Comment/testcase I18N-01?
- [Fwd: Re: REPEAT: RDF Plain Literals and xsd:string]
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- take 2: primer text for parseType="Literal"
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: Conformance statement for an "RDF document"
- Re: test failures
- REPEAT: RDF Plain Literals and xsd:string
- Re: test failures
- Re: Review of RDF semantics editor's draft July 15 2003
- Re: Review of RDF semantics editor's draft July 15 2003
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Review of RDF semantics editor's draft July 15 2003
- request chance to address i18n
- Re: important: RDF Implementation status
- Re: test failures
- Re: important: RDF Implementation status
- test failures
- Re: pfps-06
- agenda item for Friday
Wednesday, 23 July 2003
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: important: RDF Implementation status
- Re: important: RDF Implementation status
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: important: RDF Implementation status
- Re: pfps-06
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: pfps-06
- Minutes of telecon: 2003-07-18 (revised)
- important: RDF Implementation status
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
Tuesday, 22 July 2003
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- RE: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- RE: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- RE: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- RE: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- Re: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- Conformance statement for an "RDF document"
- Re: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- Re: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
Monday, 21 July 2003
- RDF Concepts editors draft updated
- Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- Re: RDF Handling of XML fragments
- first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer
- postponed issue rdfs-layered-subset created
- RE: Comment/testcase I18N-01?
Sunday, 20 July 2003
Friday, 18 July 2003
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Ameliorating no change on XML Literal design]
- IETF review of RDF media type
- RDF Handling of XML fragments
- Re: Minutes of telecon: 2003-07-18
- Minutes of telecon: 2003-07-18
- semantics doc updated
- Re: Comment/testcase I18N-01?
- Re: Comment/testcase I18N-01?
- Comment/testcase I18N-01?
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Ameliorating no change on XML Literal design]
- [Fwd: Not reopening rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure]
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-18
- horst-01 test cases
- new Primer version
Thursday, 17 July 2003
- [Fwd: agenda will be late]
- [Fwd: Re: Ameliorating no change on XML Literal design]
- [Fwd: Ameliorating no change on XML Literal design]
- Re: syntax review (points for Dave, Eric, Brian)
- Re: semantics editors draft
- Re: tests + implementation report
- Re: further horst-01 test case
- Re: further horst-01 test case
- Re: call for agenda items
- further horst-01 test case
- Re: call for agenda items
- Re: call for agenda items
- Re: call for agenda items
- last call comments without formal responses
- Re: resend: Fwd: I18N Comments]
- Re: call for agenda items
- Re: resend: Fwd: I18N Comments]
- Re: resend: Fwd: I18N Comments]
- Re: resend: Fwd: I18N Comments]
- Re: resend: Fwd: I18N Comments]
Wednesday, 16 July 2003
- Re: Proposal
- RE: XMLLiteral (was Re: call for agenda items)
- XMLLiteral (was Re: call for agenda items)
Tuesday, 15 July 2003
Wednesday, 16 July 2003
Tuesday, 15 July 2003
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Proposal
- call for agenda items
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: Assessment of RDF Scheme edits needed re rdfs:subClassOf iff -> if
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Minutes of Telecon: 2003-07-11
- telecon duration
- Re: Proposal
- Re: One last proposal before we close...
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- resend: Fwd: I18N Comments]
- Re: Related comment from XML Schema
- Re: Proposal (re rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Re: One last proposal
- Re: One last proposal
- Re: One last proposal before we close...
Monday, 14 July 2003
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Related comment from XML Schema
- Re: Proposal (re rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Re: Proposal 2
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: syntax review (points for Dave, Eric, Brian)
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Minutes of Telecon: 2003-07-11
- Re: syntax review (points for Dave, Eric, Brian)
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
Friday, 11 July 2003
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: Assessment of RDF Scheme edits needed re rdfs:subClassOf iff -> if
- Re: keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: One last proposal before we close...
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-11
- One last proposal before we close...
- keep RDFS a separate layer from RDF
- Re: Assessment of RDF Scheme edits needed re rdfs:subClassOf iff -> if
- Re: Choosing the best of three alternatives
- Assessment of RDF Scheme edits needed re rdfs:subClassOf iff -> if
- Re: Some (more) thoughts on literals and language and XML
- Re: Some (more) thoughts on literals and language and XML
- Re: Some (more) thoughts on literals and language and XML
- Re: Choosing the best of three alternatives
- Re: Some (more) thoughts on literals and language and XML
- Some (more) thoughts on literals and language and XML
- Re: Choosing the best of three alternatives
- Re: Related comment from XML Schema
- Choosing the best of three alternatives
- Proposal 2
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Proposal (re rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Re: Last call comments that made RDF Core remove lang from XML Literals
Thursday, 10 July 2003
- Re: Proposal
- Re: formalized MeetingRecords [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-11]
- missing text (was :Re:XML observation)
- Related comment from XML Schema
- Last call comments that made RDF Core remove lang from XML Literals
- Re: formalized MeetingRecords [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-11]
- RE: XML observation
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-11
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-11
- formalized MeetingRecords [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-11]
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Proposal
- Re: Proposal (re rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-07-11
- Proposal
- Re: Updated summary from I18N on 'XML Literals'
- Re: Updated summary from I18N on 'XML Literals'
- [Fwd: FYI: homepage for editors]
- Re: Updated summary from I18N on 'XML Literals'
Wednesday, 9 July 2003
- Updated summary from I18N on 'XML Literals'
- RE: XML observation
- Re: XML literals considered textual
- Re: Updated rationale for RDFCore's current design
- weekly call for telecon agenda items
- RE: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- XML literals considered textual
- Re: XML observation
Tuesday, 8 July 2003
Wednesday, 9 July 2003
Tuesday, 8 July 2003
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- Re: Updated rationale for RDFCore's current design
- Please respond to my questions
- Re: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- RE: XML observation
- Updated rationale for RDFCore's current design
- RE: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
Monday, 7 July 2003
- RE: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- RE: XML observation
- syntax review (points for Dave, Eric, Brian)
Sunday, 6 July 2003
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- Re: N-Triples part of RDF test cases updated 2003-06-26
- Re: pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax", pushback
Friday, 4 July 2003
- Re: Semantics review: XMLLiteral
- Re: Semantics review: fat?
- Re: link to OK and dodgy XSD datatypes
- Re: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
- Regrets 11th July
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- Re: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- RE: XML observation
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]
- Re: XML observation
- RE: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- RE: XML observation
- Re: Syntax wd
- XML observation
Thursday, 3 July 2003
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- RE: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- RE: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Comment on strings and languages in RDF (rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: No telecon this week
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Comment on strings and languages in RDF (rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Re: Minutes of the 2003-06-27 RDF Core WG telecon
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: semantics editors draft
Wednesday, 2 July 2003
- Re: Comment on strings and languages in RDF (rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Re: semantics editors draft
- Re: semantics editors draft
- Re: Minutes of the 2003-06-27 RDF Core WG telecon
- Re: Comment on strings and languages in RDF (rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure)
- Re: tests + implementation report
- Re: Cut back RDFCore semantics doc
- Re: Cut back RDFCore semantics doc
- Re: Cut back RDFCore semantics doc
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: semantics editors draft
- Re: Next telecon agenda (2003-07-11?): pfps-22/pfps-23
- Re: semantics editors draft
- No telecon this week
- Minutes of the 2003-06-27 RDF Core WG telecon
- Next telecon agenda (2003-07-11?): pfps-22/pfps-23
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: proposal to close pan-01
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- proposal to close Qu-03
- Re: Post-last-call comments on N-Triples notation
- proposal to close pan-01
- proposal to close pfps-02
- Proposal to close horst-01
- proposal to close pfps-06
- proposal to close pfps-04
- proposal to close pfps-09
- semantics editors draft
Tuesday, 1 July 2003
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax", pushback
- pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax", pushback
- Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)
- Re: Post-last-call comments on N-Triples notation
- Comment on semantics doc, Appendix B
- please send separate resolutions for each issue
- tests + implementation report
- tests + implementation report