- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:38:22 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: bwm <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > www-rdf-comments > > o is for process - not general discussion > > o please let editors or the chairs handle comments process > > o please keep threads together - i.e. reply to messagage > > > > Any other process issues? > > > > > > I am hoping for still greater clarity at the telecon. > > In the example of danc-01, danc-02 - I think there is a discussion to be > had, and I want WG involvement in that discussion - should I be having this > discussion: > - on w3c-rdfcore-wg > - on www-rdf-comments > - at the telecon > > or all three or what? > > Such discussion might result in substantive textual changes. Yep. The occasions where I've cross-posted I've wanted to follow up to the original sender, and open up discussion on rdfcore. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 05:39:12 UTC