W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Last call comment process

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:06:04 +0200
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B01B90A8E@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <connolly@w3.org>, <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

> >Nobody has to change any test cases or code over this;
> >it's just a matter of how the text is written.
> Is that a good rule of thumb;  If it is just a matter of 
> clarifying the 
> text to better express the intent of the WG, then editors 
> have discretion?

Fine, as long as there's a record, so that in case a member
of the WG disagrees about whether it's editorial discretion, 
someone can speak up...

Perhaps include such things as "issues" but differentiate
between editorial and WG issues -- and telecon aggendas
only address issues identified as WG issues, but the others
are documented/managed in the same place, in case what is
thought to be a simple clarification actually changes
something non-trivial.

New issues would be unclassified until the chair and
editors agree on whether they are editorial or WG


Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 10:17:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:20 UTC