- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:06:04 +0200
- To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <connolly@w3.org>, <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> >Nobody has to change any test cases or code over this; > >it's just a matter of how the text is written. > > Is that a good rule of thumb; If it is just a matter of > clarifying the > text to better express the intent of the WG, then editors > have discretion? Fine, as long as there's a record, so that in case a member of the WG disagrees about whether it's editorial discretion, someone can speak up... Perhaps include such things as "issues" but differentiate between editorial and WG issues -- and telecon aggendas only address issues identified as WG issues, but the others are documented/managed in the same place, in case what is thought to be a simple clarification actually changes something non-trivial. New issues would be unclassified until the chair and editors agree on whether they are editorial or WG issues. Eh? Patrick
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 10:17:56 UTC