- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:25:49 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Dan Connolly wrote: > > re http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/ > > I'm going over it with a fairly fine-tooth comb, > updating my larch stuff. > http://www.w3.org/XML/9711theory/RDFAbSyn.lsl > > I found 2 bugs: > > % 6.3 Graph Equality > % REVIEW: if this is really equality/identity > % (and I think the model theory sees it as such) > % then a graph isn't just a set of triples; > % it's an equivalence class of sets of triples > > if a graph is a set of triples, then graphs are > equal when they contain the same triples, full stop. > Not so. Pls fix. Jeremy's terminology (using "equal" for syntactic equality) seems to rub pretty much everyone up the wrong way, although it is technically correct. A move to using "graph isomorphism" is pure syntactic sugar, although I'll note that this terminological fix will also require a fix to a couple of words in the test cases document: Massimo objected to using "isomorphic" to describe the, erm, isomorphism relation between graphs, which is why test cases now points to jjc's definition... [[ A parser is considered to pass the test if it produces a graph equal to the graph described by the N-triples output document, according to the definition of graph equality given in [RDF-CONCEPTS]. ]] > 2ndly... > > specification of literals is goofy... "A literal in an RDF graph > contains three components called: ... > The datatype URI being an RDF URI reference. ... > A plain literal is one in which the datatype URI is absent." > Hello? you just told me every literal has one. > > Specify that the datatype URI and language identifier > are optional. Agreed; possible different interpretations of this make it hard to answer GK's question: can the literal "a" denote the same thing as the typed literal "a"^^xsd:string. I'd support clarifying this wording so that any remaining ambiguity is solely on the XSD side. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ I'm the dandy information superhighwayman.
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2003 06:26:32 UTC