Re: [Fwd: XML Schema 1.1 Requirements]

you beat me to it :)

i was about to suggest to Brian that this go on the agenda for friday. It 
would be good to have some rdfcore input/review of this document...

dan

* Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-01-22 19:26+0000]
> 
> (first sent to webont just as valid for RDFCore)
> 
> I have made two comments [2],[3] on this new WD [1] that the WG may wish to
> endorse, or follow up on.
> 
> The relevant text is:
> [[
> 3.1.2 Desiderata
> 3.1.2.2 Systematic treatment of fundamental facets (RQ-24)
> Make the treatment of fundamental facets more systematic. Define canonical
> forms for all types, and specify the rules for generating the canonical
> form, given a value. Clarify the status of anySimpleType and define its
> value space (if any). Clarify the assignment of types to nodes in the
> absence of relevant schema components. Distinguish our identity relation
> from the mathematical relation of quantitative equality.
> ]]
> 
> and
> 
> [[
> 2.5.1 Desiderata
> 2.5.1.1 First class objects (RQ-23)
> Define an algorithm for generating a URI for any construct in a schema (or,
> possibly, in a schema document), thus making schema constructs first-class
> objects in the Web. Minimally the algorithm should cover element( type)s,
> attributes, simple types, complex types, and notations. Optionally it may
> also cover other constructs such as named groups and items in enumerations
> of legal values.
> ]]
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/
> 
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JanMar/0025.html
> 
> [3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JanMar/0026.html
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 14:55:00 UTC