- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:23:09 +0100
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] > We have also not assigned a datatype or an rdfs class for the class of all > untyped literals. I believe this to be a minor error that we may wish to > consider fixing at some point. (It makes it difficult to state certain range > constraints.) indeed a minor point and a while back in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Dec/0244.html we felt that need to do the testcases and assumed rdfs:PlainLiteral rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Literal but rdfs:PlainLiteral *not* a rdfs:Datatype -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 09:23:57 UTC