- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:31:00 +0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:59 17/01/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] >3: the semantics document should say clearly (I don't know if it does) that >the denotation of an untyped literal without a language identifier is the >unicode string. >(Dan felt strongly about this, and no one else objected) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/#urisandlit [[he meaning of a literal is principally determined by its character string: it either refers to the value mapped from the string by the associated datatype, or if no datatype is provided then it refers to the literal itself, which is either a unicode character string or a pair of a string with a language tag.]] Brian
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 06:29:47 UTC