- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:42:56 +0200
- To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 15 January, 2003 13:19 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere); w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: Edits to concepts document, per 2003-01-10 telecon > > > Looks like we could go as is and fix the wording in last > call. However, if > Graham and Patrick agree updated text, I can easily apply the change. > > Brian I'm fine with either scenario, though fixing it before last call will likely avoid explanations during last call... Patrick > At 12:26 15/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > > >Not a show stopper, but still a big nit... > > > > >ACTION 2003-01-10#8 (gk) supply words for concepts section 3.3 to > > > address PatS' concerns that we stress DTing is > not XSD-only. > > > > > >Old: > > >[[ > > >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema > Part 2: Datatypes > > >[XML-SCHEMA2]. A datatype consists of a lexical space, a > value space and a > > >datatype mapping. > > >]] > > >New: > > >[[ > > >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema > Part 2: Datatypes > > >[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype > definition that follows > > >this pattern. A datatype consists of a lexical space, a > value space and a > > >datatype mapping. > > >]] > > > >This still IMO reads that "any XML Schema datatype" rather than "any > >datatype that conforms to the definition of an rdfs:Datatype". > > > >Perhaps: > > > >[[ > >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part > 2: Datatypes > >[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition > that follows > >this model, even if not actually defined in terms of XML > Schema. A datatype > >consists of a lexical space, a value space and a datatype mapping. > >]] > > > >??? > > > >Patrick > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 06:42:59 UTC