- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:27:57 +0200
- To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> > All this means is that rdfs:Literal denotes a class, but it > says nothing > > about the class extension of rdfs:Literal. > > The class extension of rdfs:Literal is understood to be a subset of LV > (see further comments below), i.e. all resources which are > denoted by a > plain (untyped) literal or a valid typed literal are in LV and hence > instances of rdfs:Literal. Or rather, the class extension of rdfs:Literal *is* LV. Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 04:28:02 UTC