- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 11:03:14 -0600
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 10:28, Jan Grant wrote: [...] > - Be really bloody careful here. Libel law (in the UK at least) does not > observe the de re/de dicto distinction; publishing a libellous > statement with qualifications or in quotes may constitute libel > itself. Don't write anything that might be construed as quasi- > legal advice into something published by the W3C (or get > someone with a legal head to check it first). I got a lawyer (Danny W.) to look at the concepts stuff a while back; he was OK with the legal stuff there. I'm pretty sure I sent mail to the WG saying so... darn; searching for the keywords I think I would have used (Weitzner, rdfms-assertion) suggests I didn't. I haven't seen any changes that suggest he should look at it again, though I haven't been following very closely. But I'm fairly confident we're OK here. EricM, if you're not, please get Danny to review it again after last call. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 6 January 2003 12:04:01 UTC