w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2003 by date

Saturday, 1 March 2003

• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Dan Brickley
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 28 February 2003

• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Jeremy Carroll
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) Frank Manola
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) Graham Klyne
• Personal URI of summary of LC comments on Concepts Graham Klyne
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Dan Brickley
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Tim Berners-Lee
• analysis of RDFS use of term 'namespace' Dan Brickley
• RE: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues pat hayes
• RDFS LC todo doc Dan Brickley
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes pat hayes
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) Dan Connolly
• Re: issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary Graham Klyne
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) Graham Klyne
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF Containers and OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll
• regrets for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-28 Jos De_Roo
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-28 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology) Dan Connolly
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March pat hayes
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon pat hayes
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-28 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

Thursday, 27 February 2003

• Re: RDF Containers and OWL Lite Brian McBride
• Re: issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary Frank Manola
• issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary Brian McBride
• Re: Draft Abstract Semantic Web Architecture Brian McBride
• Draft Abstract Semantic Web Architecture Brian McBride
• Draft Project Review Abstract for Intro Brian McBride
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Frank Manola
• RE: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes Brian McBride
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Dan Brickley
• Re: Social meaning discussion 6th March Brian McBride
• RE: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RDF Containers and OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 26 February 2003

• Social meaning discussion 6th March Jeremy Carroll
• Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon Frank Manola
• Re: completing review of lcc comments Frank Manola
• call for agenda items for this weeks telecon Brian McBride
• Re: attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes pat hayes
• completing review of lcc comments Brian McBride
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" Graham Klyne
• attempting to remove confusion RE: designating datatypes Brian McBride
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: designating datatypes Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: designating datatypes Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Tuesday, 25 February 2003

• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" pat hayes
• editors draft of Semantics. pat hayes
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Frank Manola
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Graham Klyne
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Graham Klyne
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Graham Klyne
• Re: [schema] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents Graham Klyne
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals Graham Klyne
• RE: designating datatypes pat hayes
• Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? pat hayes
• RE: designating datatypes pat hayes
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Dave Beckett
• RE: designating datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• RE: designating datatypes Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Monday, 24 February 2003

• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals pat hayes
• RE: designating datatypes pat hayes
• Re: designating datatypes pat hayes
• Fwd: Re: DAML Principal Investigators Meeting - Official Announcement pat hayes
• Re: rdfs:member for Collections and collection syntax? Dan Connolly
• Re: rdfs:member for Collections and collection syntax? pat hayes
• last call comments period ends, but ... Brian McBride
• RE: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Jeremy Carroll
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Dave Beckett
• Re: reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Jan Grant
• reagle-01, reagle-02 issues Jeremy Carroll
• Last rundown of the -comments list coming tomorrow Jan Grant
• Fwd: XQuery and XPath Full-Text Requirements and Use Cases WDs published Brian McBride
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Frank Manola
• RE: designating datatypes Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: [collections] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents Jeremy Carroll
• Re: designating datatypes Dave Beckett
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Jan Grant
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 22 February 2003

• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals Jos De_Roo

Friday, 21 February 2003

• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March pat hayes
• Re: Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled Dan Connolly
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March pat hayes
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? Frank Manola
• [schema] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents pat hayes
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? pat hayes
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals pat hayes
• Re: Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled Brian McBride
• designating datatypes pat hayes
• [schema] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents Graham Klyne
• [collections] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents Graham Klyne
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 pat hayes
• Re: subject/predicate/object terminology pat hayes
• Re: Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled Dan Connolly
• Informal RDF/HTML 2003-02-21 teleconference cancelled Eric Miller

Wednesday, 19 February 2003

• Words of wisdom from Shelley pat hayes
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: FW: Comments on RDF last call working drafts Jan Grant
• FW: Comments on RDF last call working drafts Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Tuesday, 18 February 2003

• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals Jos De_Roo
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? Graham Klyne
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Graham Klyne
• Re: handling lc comments schedule Graham Klyne
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Dan Connolly
• Re: What is scope of "RDF Core"? Brian McBride
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Brian McBride
• Re: handling lc comments schedule Brian McBride
• What is scope of "RDF Core"? Graham Klyne
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Graham Klyne
• Re: handling lc comments schedule Graham Klyne
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Graham Klyne
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Monday, 17 February 2003

• Re: Requirements for schema component designators Dave Beckett
• Telecon minutes 2003-02-14 Jan Grant
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-14 Graham Klyne
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 14 February 2003

• Re: subject/predicate/object terminology Frank Manola
• Re: subject/predicate/object terminology Brian McBride
• subject/predicate/object terminology Frank Manola
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals pat hayes
• new media type I-D Aaron Swartz
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Brian McBride
• Re: Two questions about bagid Frank Manola
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Frank Manola
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Jan Grant
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Brian McBride
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call Steven Pemberton
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call Steven Pemberton
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13 Jan Grant
• Re: Agenda (lc process) Jan Grant
• Possible regrets for telecon 2003-02-14 Graham Klyne
• Re: Agenda (lc process) Dan Connolly

Thursday, 13 February 2003

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-14 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Brian McBride
• Social Meaning Boston 6 March Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets Fri 14 Jeremy Carroll
• responding to comments Brian McBride
• call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call Brian McBride
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call Dave Beckett
• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call Steven Pemberton
• Re: Tech Plenary Meeting Eric Miller
• Re: Tech Plenary Meeting Jos De_Roo
• Re: Tech Plenary Meeting Eric Miller
• Tech Plenary Meeting Brian McBride

Wednesday, 12 February 2003

• Re: Two questions about bagid pat hayes
• Re: Two questions about bagid Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals pat hayes
• Regrets for this Friday Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• handling lc comments schedule Brian McBride
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? Frank Manola
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? Graham Klyne
• Re: Two questions about bagid Graham Klyne
• Fwd: 2003 Tech Plenary Agenda Now Available Brian McBride
• Re: Two questions about bagid Seth Russell
• Re: Two questions about bagid pat hayes
• Re: Two questions about bagid Tim Berners-Lee

Tuesday, 11 February 2003

• what was that again? pat hayes
• Re: Two questions about bagid Jan Grant
• Two questions about bagid Tim Berners-Lee

Monday, 10 February 2003

• Re: Minutes for telecon 2003-02-07 Mike Dean
• Minutes for telecon 2003-02-07 Jan Grant

Friday, 7 February 2003

• Fwd: XMLLiteral pat hayes
• Re: [Fwd: [Moderator Action] RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling] pat hayes
• Re: error in Semantics document pat hayes
• Requirements for schema component designators Mary Holstege
• belated regrets for the 2003-02-07 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-07 Dan Brickley
• reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call Dan Brickley
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-07 Frank Manola
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-07 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-05 Brian McBride
• Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-05 Jan Grant

Thursday, 6 February 2003

• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts pat hayes
• call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 Graham Klyne
• Re: LC document issue [was Re: review of primer - thumbs up] Brian McBride
• LC document issue [was Re: review of primer - thumbs up] Frank Manola
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 pat hayes

Wednesday, 5 February 2003

• Re: response to issue pfps-09 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 pat hayes
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 Brian McBride
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 Brian McBride
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 Graham Klyne
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 (second try) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• link and definition needed pat hayes
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 pat hayes
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 pat hayes
• Re: response to comment pfps-04 pat hayes
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: response to issue pfps-07 pat hayes
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 pat hayes
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 Dan Connolly
• Partial regrets for this Friday Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Summary of Last Call Process Jan Grant
• Summary of Last Call Process Brian McBride
• Re: response to issue pfps-10 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: response to issue pfps-09 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 4 February 2003

• response to issue pfps-09 pat hayes

Wednesday, 5 February 2003

• response to issue pfps-10 pat hayes

Tuesday, 4 February 2003

• Re: response to issue pfps-07 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: response to issue pfps-06 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: response to comment pfps-05 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: response to comment pfps-04 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling pat hayes
• Re: Comments on (informal) meaning of lists pat hayes
• (fwd) ICS-FORTH Validating RDF Parser (VRP) v2.5 Dan Brickley
• Re: response to semantics comment pfps-01 Graham Klyne
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling Massimo Marchiori
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts Graham Klyne
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling Graham Klyne
• Comments on (informal) meaning of lists Graham Klyne
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling pat hayes
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling Massimo Marchiori
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling pat hayes
• [Fwd: [Moderator Action] RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling] Eric Miller
• RE: response to semantics comment pfps-01 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: response to semantics comment pfps-01 Frank Manola
• Re: Last Call Comments Process Frank Manola
• RE: response to semantics comment pfps-01 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts Jan Grant
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling Massimo Marchiori
• Re: Last Call Comments Process pat hayes
• response to issue pfps-8 pat hayes

Monday, 3 February 2003

• response to issue pfps-07 pat hayes
• response to issue pfps-06 pat hayes
• response to comment pfps-05 pat hayes
• response to comment pfps-04 pat hayes
• response to pfps-03 pat hayes
• response to comment pfps-02 pat hayes
• response to semantics comment pfps-01 pat hayes
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts Dan Connolly
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call Joseph Reagle
• semantics comments pat hayes
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call pat hayes
• Re: Last Call Comments Process Brian McBride
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts pat hayes
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling pat hayes
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call Brian McBride
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Last Call Comments Process pat hayes
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call pat hayes
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary pat hayes

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

• changes to RDFS MT post-last-call pat hayes

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2003 20:36:28 UTC