- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:16:21 +0300
- To: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com] > Sent: 27 August, 2003 17:13 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Cc: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere); w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off? > > > > [had to cut my grass first...] > > Well, > > :Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer. > > does NOT entail > > :Jenny :age "10abc"^^xsd:integer. That's at least a little encouraging. > of course not. Yes, of course not insofar as *we* understand, but that doesn't mean that some scanner in some API is happy to take a string and coerce it to an integer, disregarding characters not relevant to the lexical space. I'm encouraged that neither Xerces or .NET do this, but I wouldn't have been very surprised if they had. Thanks for taking the time to test it, though. Patrick > > -- > Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ > > > > > > <Patrick.Stickler > > > @nokia.com> To: > <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, Jos > De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA > cc: > <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com> > > 2003-08-27 03:07 Subject: RE: > pfps-06 hold off? > > PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to be sadistic... > > Jos, can you test if > > :Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer. > > entails > > :Jenny :age "10abc"^^xsd:integer. > > Knowing how forgiving many scanners can be, I > won't be the least surprised if "10abc" is mapped > to the value 'ten'... > > Patrick > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > > Sent: 27 August, 2003 16:04 > > To: 'ext Jos De_Roo' > > Cc: 'w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org'; Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > > Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off? > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com] > > > Sent: 27 August, 2003 15:52 > > > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > > > Cc: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > > > Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off? > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Patrick, in what I have made of it (but I could > > > have been making further assumptions) > > > > > > :Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer. > > > > > > entails > > > > > > :Jenny :age "10.0"^^xsd:integer. > > > > > > and vice versa! > > > (tested with Xerces and .NET) > > > > HAH! I expected as much. > > > > I rest my case. > > > > This an XML "problem" and changing our definition of the L2V > > mapping and our strict view about valid lexical forms is just > > begging for trouble. > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2003 05:16:30 UTC