- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:13:02 +0200
- To: "<Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[had to cut my grass first...] Well, :Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer. does NOT entail :Jenny :age "10abc"^^xsd:integer. of course not. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ <Patrick.Stickler @nokia.com> To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com> 2003-08-27 03:07 Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off? PM Just to be sadistic... Jos, can you test if :Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer. entails :Jenny :age "10abc"^^xsd:integer. Knowing how forgiving many scanners can be, I won't be the least surprised if "10abc" is mapped to the value 'ten'... Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Sent: 27 August, 2003 16:04 > To: 'ext Jos De_Roo' > Cc: 'w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org'; Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com] > > Sent: 27 August, 2003 15:52 > > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > > Cc: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > > Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off? > > > > > > > > Well Patrick, in what I have made of it (but I could > > have been making further assumptions) > > > > :Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer. > > > > entails > > > > :Jenny :age "10.0"^^xsd:integer. > > > > and vice versa! > > (tested with Xerces and .NET) > > HAH! I expected as much. > > I rest my case. > > This an XML "problem" and changing our definition of the L2V > mapping and our strict view about valid lexical forms is just > begging for trouble. > > Patrick >
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 10:13:15 UTC