- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:13:02 +0200
- To: "<Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[had to cut my grass first...]
Well,
:Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer.
does NOT entail
:Jenny :age "10abc"^^xsd:integer.
of course not.
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
<Patrick.Stickler
@nokia.com> To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA
cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
2003-08-27 03:07 Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off?
PM
Just to be sadistic...
Jos, can you test if
:Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer.
entails
:Jenny :age "10abc"^^xsd:integer.
Knowing how forgiving many scanners can be, I
won't be the least surprised if "10abc" is mapped
to the value 'ten'...
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> Sent: 27 August, 2003 16:04
> To: 'ext Jos De_Roo'
> Cc: 'w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org'; Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off?
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com]
> > Sent: 27 August, 2003 15:52
> > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> > Cc: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> > Subject: RE: pfps-06 hold off?
> >
> >
> >
> > Well Patrick, in what I have made of it (but I could
> > have been making further assumptions)
> >
> > :Jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer.
> >
> > entails
> >
> > :Jenny :age "10.0"^^xsd:integer.
> >
> > and vice versa!
> > (tested with Xerces and .NET)
>
> HAH! I expected as much.
>
> I rest my case.
>
> This an XML "problem" and changing our definition of the L2V
> mapping and our strict view about valid lexical forms is just
> begging for trouble.
>
> Patrick
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 10:13:15 UTC