- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:38:18 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, i18n <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Hi Martin, Martin Duerst wrote: [...] > > > Do you have any idea of what the RDF Core WG might be going to do with it? There are currently no plans to change this. > > Btw, a page with the documentation of our formal objection is taking shape > at http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2003/rdf.html. [This is currently > member-only.] That is helpful. Thank you for the link. [...] > > - There is the issue of equivalence between plain literals and XML > Literals. On this issue, we have discovered that this equivalence > doesn't hold rather late in the process, and have therefore not > insisted on it (apart from the confusing equivalence with octets > that turned up at some point). I think that a lot of progress has > been made on this issue, so it could be left as is, but with a new > last call, we may want to consider whether we should bring it up > and ask for full resolution. This is the one that I particularly had in mind when I asked the question. Addressing it would require some change to the current design. > > - We may have to think about whether we should register an issue > with regards to the treatment of XML Literals as types. When > I read some of the last call documents, I found this treatment > odd, but thought that it may be okay as a technical device as > long as it didn't have any undesirable side-effects. Ok. That's a new one on my mental list. > > > I hope that this is the kind of information you were looking for. > If not, please feel free to tell me. Very much so. My concern is to determine whether RDFCore can move to a second last call immediately. It doesn't seem like a good idea to do a second last call with the current ed's drafts then make substantive changes as the result of last call comments on that and then have to do a third last call. Before doing a second last call we should ensure that RDFCore have considered all the comments I18N would like to make. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2003 06:39:53 UTC