- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 01:19:41 +0200
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
[...] Thanks for adding my regrets (they were made a week ago and were also for the 2003-08-29 telecon) > BWM noted that jjc was not present and was known to have strong views > that the next step should be CR. I think that too, and I have a lot of stuff on my stack and don't like the idea of extending indefinitely... One has to choose and do those things that one really want to go for. > EM noted that if there are unresolved issues, they can still appear at > CR or even PR, and it is better to get them in a LC. Right. > Danbri asked if the editors had the energy for another last call: > > DaveB: yes > Frank: yes > JanG: yes > Danbri: yes > > bwm's employer wishes him to spend less time on RDFCore. It is indeed taking a very (too) long time... -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 23 August 2003 19:19:56 UTC