- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:57:19 +0100 (BST)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
These are up until the last meeting, the minutes of which I'm about to
produce.
I'll recreate the test case tables at the end of today.
19: test cases
2002-11-22#2 jang [test case fix] remove RDFS entailment rules from
the language-ignored-for-numeric-types cases.
DONE, although this testis now obsolete due to datatype decisions.
2003-04-04#9 jang Remove bagId tests from test cases.
done
20030425#2 jang add test case for pfps-10 (from originating email)
DONE, test is under pfps-10/
20030509#12 jang Review all tests to make changes concerning typed
literals
The following test cases are obsolete:
language-important-for-non-dt-entailment-1
language-important-for-non-dt-entailment-2
These are also similarly out-of-date:
langauge-ignored-for-numeric-types-1
language-ignored-for-numeric-types-2
language-ignored-for-numeric-types-3
And this:
language-and-xml-literal
...since the NTriples are invalid (lang tags on XML Literal)
I no longer believe this test case to be true:
semantic-equivalence-between-datatypes
(that integer 1 = decimal 1.0 in XSD)
... seeking confirmation before I obsolete it.
Other XMLLiteral tests with langauge:
none that were ever approved.
20030509#20 jang Is inverse of test case 0097 true or not?
Good question. The message in question is
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0097.html
As per last week's telecon, the answer is "false", and we leave test
cases to that effect. However, JJC has a normative implementation
note addressing this.
20030627#6 JanG add tests for intensional subClassOf semantics.
These are DONe, in horst-01/
20030718#7 JanG update test case language-and-xml-literal to be
positive
This test case is obsolete since NTriples reflects teh abstract syntax;
there are no langauge tags on XMLLiterals. The datatypes/test001 parser
test captures this now.
2003-08-01#4 jang: respond to daveR on his comments on testcases
DONE, see message [actually I can't find this, will follow up with
message number]
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 05:58:53 UTC