- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:04:55 +0300
- To: <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Frank Manola [mailto:fmanola@mitre.org] > Sent: 12 August, 2003 16:24 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Text for FAQ re rdf:datatype="&rdfs;#XMLLiteral" > > > I don't think any special attention given to rdf:XMLLiteral by > > RDF parsers breaks any model, but I agree that we should be clear > > about the what's and why's. > > > > > I repeat, it's not special attention given to rdf:XMLLiteral by RDF > parsers that seems to break the model, it's that this > attention would be > optional. OK. So the question to the WG appears to be: Should RDF parsers be required to validate all lexical forms for rdf:XMLLiteral, no matter how they are expressed in the RDF/XML? I myself would like to say "yes". And I understand you to hold the same position -- so that the model remains consistent. I'd like to hear what the parser gurus think (as well as the rest of the WG). Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2003 02:05:11 UTC