Re: Possible new RDF test "<br/>" in RDF/XML exc-canonicalizing to "<br></br>"

At 14:29 06/08/03 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>I've no objection in principle, and I'd rather satisfy folks than not. 
>However, this is late in the day.  We will need to be careful about what 
>we say in the implementation report, or ask folks to retest.  Does this 
>test really add something new?

Would there be scope for collecting "additional" or "unofficial" test cases 
that can be folded into the mainstream in a future cycle?

#g


------------
Graham Klyne          _________
GK@ninebynine.org  ___|_o_o_o_|_¬
                    \____________/
(nb Helva)       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   @Kingston, River Thames

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 04:45:29 UTC