- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:43:26 +0200
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, <emmanuel@w3.org>
- Cc: "ext Frank Manola" <fmanola@mitre.org>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I suspect Emmanuel just needs to slot in the latest Jena release ... (I understand the validator is now using the version 2 stream which is up to date on all WG decisions) Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dave Beckett > Sent: 11 August 2003 10:17 > To: Patrick Stickler > Cc: ext Frank Manola; w3c-rdfcore-wg > Subject: Re: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03 > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > I recall the decision was "doesn't have to generate" not > > "should not generate". > > > > So technically, the validator is conformant. Though someone > > may still wish to change it to omit the triples in question. > > There is no fuzziness at all in what triples are generated > from RDF/XML - that is one of the things we were revising for. > parseType="Collection" must not generate them after our change. > > Applications that don't want to be conformant can do what they > like, as always. > > Dave > >
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 04:53:22 UTC