w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002 by date

Tuesday, 1 October 2002

• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Frank Manola

Monday, 30 September 2002

• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Dan Connolly
• On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Sergey Melnik
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: clarify "inline literals" Stephen Petschulat
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) Eric Miller
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Graham Klyne
• Datatyped literals, another "test case" Graham Klyne
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Dan Connolly
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) Frank Manola
• Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case Graham Klyne
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Brian McBride
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Dave Beckett
• Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) Brian McBride
• Re: Proposal for Deferrment and Closure (was Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Brian McBride
• Proposal for Deferrment and Closure (was Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 29 September 2002

• test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Brian McBride

Saturday, 28 September 2002

• Re: clarify "inline literals" Jos De_Roo
• clarify "inline literals" Brian McBride
• Re: Explanation? of difference between Patrick and Brian [was: Re: Intentions of XMP] Brian McBride
• Re: 2002-09-27 telecon minutes Brian McBride
• new postponed issue #rdf-embedded Brian McBride
• Re: results of untidy experiment Jos De_Roo
• Re: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range pat hayes

Friday, 27 September 2002

• Redesigning CC/PP for tidy literals Graham Klyne
• apologies pat hayes
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) Graham Klyne
• 2002-09-27 telecon minutes Graham Klyne
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF lists Graham Klyne
• results of untidy experiment Jos De_Roo
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Patrick Stickler
• Regrets for _next_ week's telecon (2002-10-04) Jan Grant
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatype property in the statement object pair Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatype property in the statement object pair Jos De_Roo
• Re: datatype property in the statement object pair Patrick Stickler
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Frank Manola
• datatype property in the statement object pair Jos De_Roo
• possible partial regrets Jeremy Carroll
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) Frank Manola
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Brian McBride
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Sergey Melnik
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) Jan Grant
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Patrick Stickler
• Re: Explanation? of difference between Patrick and Brian [was: Re: Intentions of XMP] Patrick Stickler
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-27 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Brian McBride
• Explanation? of difference between Patrick and Brian [was: Re: Intentions of XMP] Brian McBride
• Fw: Datatyping Patrick Stickler
• Re: a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) Patrick Stickler
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) Patrick Stickler
• a cunning plan (was: Re: On Consensus) pat hayes
• Re: RDF lists pat hayes
• Re: RDF lists pat hayes
• Re: Intentions of XMP Patrick Stickler
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Patrick Stickler
• Re: why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) Patrick Stickler
• why I object (was: Intentions of XMP) Aaron Swartz

Thursday, 26 September 2002

• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Jos De_Roo
• Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision Patrick Stickler
• Re: Intentions of XMP Brian McBride
• Reopening tidy/untidy decision Eric Miller
• Re: Intentions of XMP Patrick Stickler
• Re: Intentions of XMP Brian McBride
• Re: Intentions of XMP Patrick Stickler
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Patrick Stickler
• Fwd: Re: Intentions of XMP Patrick Stickler
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Jan Grant
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Patrick Stickler
• Re: Intentions of XMP Patrick Stickler
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Jan Grant
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Brian McBride
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Patrick Stickler
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Brian McBride
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Patrick Stickler
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks Patrick Stickler
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Brian McBride
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks Sergey Melnik
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) Graham Klyne
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Patrick Stickler
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks Patrick Stickler
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks Sergey Melnik
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Patrick Stickler
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Patrick Stickler
• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 25 September 2002

• Re: Weekly call for agenda items Jos De_Roo
• Weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride

Thursday, 26 September 2002

• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 25 September 2002

• Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks Jos De_Roo
• Re: Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Brian McBride
• Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks Sergey Melnik
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Patrick Stickler
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Graham Klyne
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Jeremy Carroll
• Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation Patrick Stickler
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Frank Manola
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Patrick Stickler
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Jan Grant
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Brian McBride
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Patrick Stickler
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Graham Klyne
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Brian McBride
• Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Tidy vs untidy literals: 2 test cases motivated by CC/PP Jos De_Roo
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20, ACTION 2002-09-20#2 ("assertion") Graham Klyne
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Patrick Stickler
• Re: On Consensus Patrick Stickler
• monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus] Brian McBride
• Minutes: 2002-09-20 (retry) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Patrick Stickler
• Tidy vs untidy literals: 2 test cases motivated by CC/PP Graham Klyne
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Brian McBride
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: On Consensus Jeremy Carroll
• Re: On Consensus Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 24 September 2002

• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: The case for untidy literal semantics Frank Manola
• The case for untidy literal semantics Brian McBride
• Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20 Frank Manola
• Minutes: 2002-09-20 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics Brian McBride
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: On Consensus Frank Manola
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• RE: On Consensus Jeremy Carroll
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• On Consensus Brian McBride

Monday, 23 September 2002

• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) Jos De_Roo
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Brian McBride
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes Patrick Stickler
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes Sergey Melnik
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes Sergey Melnik
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Jos De_Roo
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Patrick Stickler
• RE: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: syntax and semantics Patrick Stickler
• RE: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: syntax and semantics Jan Grant
• syntax and semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) Jos De_Roo
• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: Abstract data model update - discussion Patrick Stickler
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Jeremy Carroll
• RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3) Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 22 September 2002

• Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics Jan Grant

Saturday, 21 September 2002

• DECIDED: untidy semantics Jos De_Roo
• Abstract data model update - discussion Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatype explanations questions Patrick Stickler

Friday, 20 September 2002

• Re: datatype explanations questions Dave Beckett
• datatype explanations questions Frank Manola
• Re: RDF lists Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF lists Graham Klyne
• Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals Dave Beckett
• Re: xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes Dan Connolly
• xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes Sergey Melnik
• Re: RDF lists Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF lists pat hayes
• Re: RDF lists pat hayes
• possible regrets for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-20 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF lists Graham Klyne
• Re: Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc Dan Brickley
• Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc Brian McBride
• Gentile utente Telecom italia freshsponsor
• Re: RDF lists Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 19 September 2002

• RDF lists pat hayes
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches Graham Klyne
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-20 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Dan Brickley
• Re: Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Brian McBride
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches Brian McBride
• Minutes of telecon 2002-09-13 Brian McBride
• Re: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" Patrick Stickler
• Re: Technical change to the RDFS MT Graham Klyne
• RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" Dave Beckett
• RE: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: An observation about rdf:Seq Dave Beckett

Wednesday, 18 September 2002

• An observation about rdf:Seq Graham Klyne

Thursday, 19 September 2002

• Fwd: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang="" Brian McBride

Wednesday, 18 September 2002

• Technical change to the RDFS MT pat hayes
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches Jeremy Carroll
• Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches Graham Klyne
• Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Graham Klyne
• Re: decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 17 September 2002

• Re: daml:collection is just Literal test: need help with details [was: current action list] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-05-31 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals Jeremy Carroll
• Arguments for Value-Based Inline Literal Semantics Patrick Stickler
• Kudos to the primer editors and contributors Brian McBride

Monday, 16 September 2002

• RDF concepts -- editors' issue list Graham Klyne
• decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals Brian McBride
• RE: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 14 September 2002

• Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. Graham Klyne

Friday, 13 September 2002

• Discussing tidiness of untyped RDF literals Graham Klyne
• RE: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. Jos De_Roo
• Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model. Jan Grant
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Patrick Stickler
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals Jeremy Carroll
• aob for the telecon fwd: Technical Plenary Logistics -- please reply by 30 September Brian McBride
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals Sergey Melnik
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Jan Grant
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals Patrick Stickler
• abstract syntax representation of inline literals Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 12 September 2002

• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Patrick Stickler
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Jeremy Carroll
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-13 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Brian McBride
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Patrick Stickler
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Patrick Stickler
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Patrick Stickler
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: New I-D Up Brian McBride
• 2002-09-06#5 Datatype actions Brian McBride
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Patrick Stickler
• Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 11 September 2002

• New I-D Up Aaron Swartz
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• In recognition of the efforts of PatH, Sergey and PatS on datatypes Brian McBride
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Brian McBride
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Patrick Stickler
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Jan Grant
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness Brian McBride
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Patrick Stickler
• RE: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness Brian McBride
• Re: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness Patrick Stickler
• RE: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Patrick Stickler
• Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness Jeremy Carroll
• Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 10 September 2002

• RE: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1 Graham Klyne
• Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1) Graham Klyne
• Re: Untyped Literal Semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1 Patrick Stickler
• Re: in line literal semantics (and some thoughts on CC/PP) Patrick Stickler

Monday, 9 September 2002

• Comments on new datatyping document, part 1 Graham Klyne
• faq-html-compliance is closed Brian McBride
• Re: Untyped Literal Semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: in line literal semantics (and some thoughts on CC/PP) Graham Klyne
• Re: Draft minutes: telecon 2002-09-06 (namespace last call) Graham Klyne
• Re: in line literal semantics Jan Grant
• Re: Untyped Literal Semantics Patrick Stickler
• Untyped Literal Semantics Brian McBride
• Re: in line literal semantics Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 8 September 2002

• in line literal semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30] Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 7 September 2002

• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Jos De_Roo

Friday, 6 September 2002

• Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30] Jos De_Roo
• Regrets for 2002-08-13 telecon Dave Beckett
• Draft minutes: telecon 2002-09-06 Jan Grant
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Patrick Stickler
• should be 2002-09-06 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30] Brian McBride
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Dave Beckett
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Jos De_Roo
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Patrick Stickler
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Patrick Stickler
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Patrick Stickler
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Dave Beckett
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Brian McBride
• Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30] Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 5 September 2002

• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts Graham Klyne

Friday, 6 September 2002

• Re: Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1 Jeremy Carroll
• Fwd: Helpers for specification editors Brian McBride
• handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags pat hayes
• rdf(s):Literal and stuff like that pat hayes
• RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30] Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 5 September 2002

• Re: Distributing Datatypes Part 1 amongst the other docs Dan Brickley
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Distributing Datatypes Part 1 amongst the other docs Brian McBride
• Fwd: to eds: document technologies survey Brian McBride
• Re: Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1 Brian McBride
• Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1 Paul Grosso
• Re: Comments on datatyping draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary Graham Klyne
• RE: Datatypes Draft Questions & Comments Graham Klyne
• RE: Comments on datatyping draft Graham Klyne
• Re: xsi:type not specializable [was: datatypes status Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec Brian McBride
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec Jan Grant
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec Patrick Stickler
• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts Eric Miller

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Brian McBride
• Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec Jan Grant
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Brian McBride
• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts Brian McBride
• Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Tuesday, 3 September 2002

• Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts Frank Manola
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Jeremy Carroll
• 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts Brian McBride
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Jan Grant
• Re: XML Base - should be used Dave Beckett
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Dave Beckett
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Dave Beckett
• RE: Document structure Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: XML Base - should be used Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Monday, 2 September 2002

• Re: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Jeremy Carroll
• regrets for Sept 6 teleconference Frank Manola
• Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit" Jan Grant
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals Jeremy Carroll
• Document structure Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals Dave Beckett
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Jeremy Carroll
• XML Base - should be used Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals Jan Grant
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Jos De_Roo
• RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals Dave Beckett
• RE: Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary Jan Grant
• Minutes of RDF Core WG telcon, 2002-08-30 Dave Beckett
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Jos De_Roo
• RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Sunday, 1 September 2002

• Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary Jan Grant
• Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate Jan Grant

Saturday, 31 August 2002

• RE: type not specializable [was: datatypes status Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Datatypes Draft Questions & Comments Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 20:56:50 UTC