w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002 by date

Sunday, 1 December 2002

• Re: More on XSD in RDF pat hayes
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ pat hayes
• Re: rdfD1 rule and xsd-rules pat hayes
• Re: More on XSD in RDF pat hayes
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal pat hayes
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal pat hayes
• Re: datatype test case pat hayes
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) pat hayes

Friday, 29 November 2002

• Re: Quick review of RDF primer Frank Manola
• Re: Copyright on xsd schema doc [was: Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Patrick Stickler
• Clarifying what datatype entailment support means (Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal) Patrick Stickler
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Patrick Stickler
• defn of blank nodes and triples RE: Review of 21-Nov concepts draft, part 3, sect 3-end Jeremy Carroll
• RE: parseType="Literal" Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 28 November 2002

• Quick review of RDF primer Graham Klyne
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Jan Grant
• Re: parseType="Literal" Brian McBride
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Brian McBride
• Cancelling telecon 20021129 Brian McBride
• Re: Regrets for 2002-11-29 telcon Frank Manola
• Regrets for 2002-11-29 telcon Dave Beckett
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Brian McBride
• Copyright on xsd schema doc [was: Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Brian McBride

Wednesday, 27 November 2002

• Re: The emperor's new datatypes Brian McBride
• Re: closing 2002-06-17#5 re rdfs-isDefinedBy (RDFS TODO) Brian McBride
• Re: The emperor's new datatypes Dan Connolly
• Re: The emperor's new datatypes Brian McBride
• The emperor's new datatypes Graham Klyne
• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 26 November 2002

• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF Jos De_Roo
• RE: Yet more XSD/RDF Jeremy Carroll
• RE: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF Jan Grant
• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF Dan Connolly
• Yet more XSD/RDF Jeremy Carroll
• current Primer status Frank Manola
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Jan Grant
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Jan Grant
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Jan Grant
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Patrick Stickler
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler

Monday, 25 November 2002

• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Dan Connolly
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Dan Connolly
• Re: Last Call publication process proposal Jeremy Carroll
• Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] Brian McBride
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Dan Connolly
• Minutes: telecon 2002-11-22 Jan Grant
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Brian McBride
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jan Grant
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Graham Klyne
• RE: weekly call for agenda items Graham Klyne
• Graphs and documents Graham Klyne
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Graham Klyne
• Re: parseType="Literal" Graham Klyne
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Graham Klyne
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership Graham Klyne
• Re: Last Call publication process proposal Graham Klyne
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership Graham Klyne
• Using third-party vocabularies Graham Klyne
• Authoritative definition of a predicate Graham Klyne
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Graham Klyne
• RE: Concepts heads-up Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Concepts heads-up Dave Beckett
• Concepts heads-up Jeremy Carroll
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler
• RE: More on XSD in RDF Jeremy Carroll
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Dave Beckett
• Re: More on XSD in RDF Patrick Stickler
• More on XSD in RDF Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 24 November 2002

• rdfD1 rule and xsd-rules Jos De_Roo
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 23 November 2002

• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Jos De_Roo
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Jan Grant
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Jan Grant
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Jan Grant
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Jos De_Roo

Friday, 22 November 2002

• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) Dan Connolly
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Dan Connolly
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Brian McBride
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) Dan Connolly
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) Brian McBride
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Dan Connolly
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Dan Connolly
• Assertion and social meaning stuff - overlap semantics and concepts Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Dan Connolly
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Jeremy Carroll
• parseType="Literal" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) Dan Connolly
• Re: 2002-06-17#1 re rdfms-seq-representation in RDFS Dan Connolly
• xsd:float and xsd:decimal Jeremy Carroll
• Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. Jan Grant
• test case names - frag IDs Jeremy Carroll
• datatype test case Brian McBride
• closing 2002-06-17#5 re rdfs-isDefinedBy (RDFS TODO) Dan Brickley
• 2002-06-17#1 re rdfms-seq-representation in RDFS Dan Brickley
• Regrets for Nov 29 Patrick Stickler
• Suggested URI reference text. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-22 Mike Dean
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Jeremy Carroll
• XML literal namespaces test cases Jeremy Carroll
• resurfacing Dan Brickley
• Re: The first sentence Frank Manola
• Domain and range proposed test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: The first sentence Brian McBride
• Re: The first sentence Jeremy Carroll
• Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Dave Beckett
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Patrick Stickler
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model pat hayes

Thursday, 21 November 2002

• Nov WDs do not link check Jeremy Carroll
• Re: early uniform normalization RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership Jeremy Carroll
• Semantic anchors Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) pat hayes
• Primer revisions and schedule Frank Manola
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-22 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model pat hayes
• RE: weekly call for agenda items pat hayes
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] pat hayes
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership Frank Manola
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership Jeremy Carroll
• Re: early uniform normalization RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Brian McBride
• 2002-11-15#4 how to manage comments Brian McBride
• early uniform normalization RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Jeremy Carroll
• 2002-11-15#1 what to read to review datatypes Brian McBride
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership Jeremy Carroll
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership Dan Connolly
• properties and namespaces question Brian McBride
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Brian McBride
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Brian McBride
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) pat hayes
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership Frank Manola
• Last Call publication process proposal Jeremy Carroll
• test case representation Brian McBride
• freenet URIs and URI ownership Jeremy Carroll
• MITRE email will be out again this weekend Frank Manola
• Brian's article on Jena Frank Manola
• RE: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jan Grant
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Brian McBride
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Brian McBride
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase Jos De_Roo
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• RE: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jan Grant
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Jos De_Roo
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
• RE: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• RE: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatype test cases ... Patrick Stickler
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Patrick Stickler
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Patrick Stickler
• RDF Primer Primer Aaron Swartz

Wednesday, 20 November 2002

• Re: weekly call for agenda items pat hayes
• Re: inter-document transfers Frank Manola
• Re: inter-document transfers Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Primer reification section Frank Manola
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) pat hayes
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatype test cases ... Jeremy Carroll
• Re: weekly call for agenda items pat hayes
• Re: bnode entailment pat hayes
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] pat hayes
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] pat hayes
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) pat hayes
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] pat hayes
• Re: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 pat hayes
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model pat hayes
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• [w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none> Brian McBride
• bnode entailment Brian McBride
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Brian McBride
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Jan Grant
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Brian McBride
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] pat hayes
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Jan Grant
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Dave Beckett
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Brian McBride
• do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] Brian McBride
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jan Grant
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Brian McBride
• Re: Primer reification section Dan Connolly
• Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jan Grant
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jan Grant
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Brian McBride
• Re: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Brian McBride
• Re: Primer reification section Brian McBride
• Re: First bit of datatype test cases (for Jos): manifest support. Jan Grant
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) pat hayes
• Re: Primer reification section pat hayes
• Re: First bit of datatype test cases (for Jos): manifest support. pat hayes
• Re: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 pat hayes
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase pat hayes

Tuesday, 19 November 2002

• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jos De_Roo
• Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) Jan Grant
• Re: Primer reification section Dan Brickley
• Primer reification section Frank Manola
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Dave Beckett
• First bit of datatype test cases (for Jos): manifest support. Jan Grant

Monday, 18 November 2002

• Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Graham Klyne
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase Jos De_Roo
• concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 Jan Grant
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase Jan Grant
• RE: TEST: datatype testcase Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 17 November 2002

• TEST: datatype testcase Jos De_Roo

Friday, 15 November 2002

• rdfs:XMLLiteral -> rdf:XMLLiteral done (in RDFS) Dan Brickley
• Re: inter-document transfers Dan Connolly
• Regrets Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 14 November 2002

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15 Mike Dean
• Re: inter-document transfers Graham Klyne
• Re: inter-document transfers Frank Manola
• Re: inter-document transfers Graham Klyne
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons Graham Klyne
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15 Frank Manola
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• another interdoc transfer: semantics Brian McBride
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons Brian McBride
• inter-document transfers Brian McBride
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons Graham Klyne
• Re: RDFS: new editors working draft URL Brian McBride
• RDFS: new editors working draft URL Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 13 November 2002

• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) pat hayes
• Re: Publication of RDFCore working drafts Dan Connolly
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) pat hayes
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Publication of RDFCore working drafts Brian McBride
• Re: Publication of RDFCore working drafts Dave Beckett
• Publication of RDFCore working drafts Eric Miller
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) Dan Connolly
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) Dan Connolly
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) pat hayes
• possible regrets Jos De_Roo
• Re: ask webont to review docs Brian McBride
• Re: testing http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest Brian McBride
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons Brian McBride
• ask webont to review docs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dave Beckett
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) Brian McBride
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 12 November 2002

• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) Dan Connolly
• Re: reviewing RDF Schema [was: RDFS snapshot] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Publication of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) Dave Beckett
• new publications Frank Manola
• Publication of RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax Eric Miller
• Publication of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) Eric Miller
• 2 new RDF WDs published: RDF Concepts, RDF/XML Syntax Dave Beckett
• testing http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest Jos De_Roo
• Lbase cleanup now online Dan Brickley
• Re: References Boiler Plate Brian McBride
• Re: References Boiler Plate Frank Manola
• Re: reviewing RDF Schema [was: RDFS snapshot] Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFS snapshot Frank Manola
• Re: NTriple review Dave Beckett
• Re: MT document Graham Klyne
• Re: negative progress on rdf semantics document. Graham Klyne
• reviewing RDF Schema [was: RDFS snapshot] Jos De_Roo

Monday, 11 November 2002

• Re: NTriple review Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 12 November 2002

• MT document pat hayes
• negative progress on rdf semantics document. pat hayes
• RDFS snapshot Dan Brickley

Monday, 11 November 2002

• Re: More semantic comments pat hayes
• RE: mt comments attached this time. Brian McBride
• RE: mt comments attached this time. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: NTriple review Jeremy Carroll
• mt comments attached this time. Brian McBride
• no critical problems found in model theory doc Brian McBride
• Re: NTriple review Brian McBride
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up Graham Klyne
• Re: NTriple review Graham Klyne
• Re: Review of N-triples in test cases Graham Klyne
• Regrets for next two telecons Graham Klyne
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up Brian McBride
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Frank Manola
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up pat hayes
• Re: Some semantics comments - more later. pat hayes
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) pat hayes
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms] pat hayes
• Re: quick comment on typed literals pat hayes
• NOT MT Error? Brian McBride
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) pat hayes
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• MT Error? Brian McBride
• Re: publish new test cases document Dave Beckett
• re: References Boiler Plate Brian McBride
• publish model theory Brian McBride
• publish new test cases document Brian McBride
• Re: NTriple review Jos De_Roo
• Thumbs up ntriples Jeremy Carroll
• Re: NTriple review Brian McBride
• Re: NTriple review Brian McBride
• RDF Test Cases WD for review & approval Dave Beckett
• Re: NTriple review Dave Beckett
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) Frank Manola
• Re: NTriple review Jos De_Roo
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up Jos De_Roo
• Re: rdfs closures Jos De_Roo
• More semantic comments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: NTriple review Dave Beckett
• Re: Review of N-triples in test cases Dave Beckett
• Re: NTriple review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up Brian McBride
• Re: NTriple review Dave Beckett
• Re: Some semantics comments - more later. Jeremy Carroll
• NTriple review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms] Brian McBride
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Minutes of RDF Core Telecon 2002-11-08 Patrick Stickler
• Re: quick comment on typed literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. Patrick Stickler
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Brian McBride
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) Brian McBride
• re: References Boiler Plate Brian McBride
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] Brian McBride
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Brian McBride
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Graham Klyne
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) pat hayes
• Re: rdfs closures pat hayes
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs pat hayes

Sunday, 10 November 2002

• Re: rdfs closures Jos De_Roo
• Re: rdfs closures Jos De_Roo
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) Frank Manola
• review of Schema (quick) Frank Manola
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... Jos De_Roo
• Re: re lists Jos De_Roo
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dave Beckett
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) Dave Beckett
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dave Beckett
• Re: re lists Dave Beckett
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... Dave Beckett
• re: References Boiler Plate Brian McBride
• Re: rdfs closures Jos De_Roo
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... Graham Klyne
• Re: Problem with how to think about lists Graham Klyne
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) Graham Klyne
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Graham Klyne
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Graham Klyne
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. Graham Klyne
• Re: Model theory, possibly critical comment Graham Klyne
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up Graham Klyne
• Re: "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly Graham Klyne
• Review of N-triples in test cases Graham Klyne
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review pat hayes
• rdfs closures pat hayes
• Re: References boiler plate pat hayes
• Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) pat hayes
• Re: Semantics thumbs up pat hayes
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review pat hayes
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs pat hayes
• re: References Boiler Plate pat hayes
• Re: Some semantics comments - more later. pat hayes
• Re: rdf:value ?? pat hayes
• Re: rdf:value ?? Dan Brickley

Saturday, 9 November 2002

• rdf:value ?? pat hayes
• re lists pat hayes
• Re: "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly pat hayes
• Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc Frank Manola
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] pat hayes
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc pat hayes
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... pat hayes
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs pat hayes
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• RDFS Schema pat hayes
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up pat hayes
• re: References Boiler Plate Frank Manola
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. pat hayes
• Re: Model theory, possibly critical comment pat hayes
• Some semantics comments - more later. Jeremy Carroll
• Brian was being silly [was Re: Problem with how to think about lists] Brian McBride
• Problem with how to think about lists Brian McBride
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review Brian McBride
• References boiler plate Brian McBride
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review Jos De_Roo
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Jos De_Roo
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review Dan Brickley
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dan Brickley
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Brian McBride
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... Brian McBride
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review Brian McBride
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review Dan Brickley
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Graham Klyne
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Graham Klyne
• response to Brian's rdfs review Dan Brickley
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... Jos De_Roo
• Re: Semantics thumbs up Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Thumbs down to schema Jeremy Carroll
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Jos De_Roo
• "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly Jeremy Carroll
• Model theory review, thumbs up Graham Klyne
• Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... Graham Klyne
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] Brian McBride
• Thumbs down to schema Brian McBride
• Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc Jos De_Roo
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Jos De_Roo
• Model theory, possibly critical comment Graham Klyne
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Graham Klyne
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Graham Klyne
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. Graham Klyne
• Model theory, possibly critical comment Graham Klyne
• Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? Dan Brickley

Friday, 8 November 2002

• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Frank Manola
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Minutes of RDF Core Telecon 2002-11-08 Mike Dean
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? pat hayes
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Jeremy Carroll
• Semantics thumbs up Jeremy Carroll
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? pat hayes
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. pat hayes
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? Jos De_Roo
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Brian McBride
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? Brian McBride
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Dan Connolly
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Dan Brickley
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? Dan Brickley
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms pat hayes
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dan Brickley
• another MT point for reviewers pat hayes
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dan Connolly
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dave Beckett
• Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. pat hayes
• XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs Dan Connolly
• quick MT comment Jos De_Roo
• Web Ontology Language (OWL) Guide W3C Working Draft 4 November 2002 (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Re: quick comment on typed literals pat hayes
• RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc Dan Brickley
• Re: Primer review -- partial - thumbs up Frank Manola
• RE: Primer review -- partial - thumbs up Jeremy Carroll
• Re: making publishing easier? Graham Klyne
• Re: quick comment on typed literals Graham Klyne
• Re: new Primer version Frank Manola
• Re: MT draft Brian McBride
• Re: RDFS draft (was Re: MT draft) Brian McBride
• Re: MT draft Brian McBride
• Re: new Primer version Dan Connolly
• RDFS draft (was Re: MT draft) Dan Brickley

Thursday, 7 November 2002

• MT draft pat hayes
• new Primer version Frank Manola
• Re: Primer review -- partial - thumbs up Frank Manola
• Re: Primer review -- thumbs up Stephen Petschulat
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-08 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Primer review -- partial - thumbs up Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please pat hayes
• RE: making publishing easier? Jeremy Carroll
• making publishing easier? Brian McBride
• RE: 60+30 minute telecon Jeremy Carroll
• 60+30 minute telecon Brian McBride
• Re: access to MT editors version Brian McBride
• Re: MT editors draft Brian McBride
• Re: quick comment on typed literals Brian McBride
• Re: rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please Brian McBride
• Re: Syntax doc references Dave Beckett
• RE: access to MT editors version Jeremy Carroll
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? Frank Manola
• Re: HELP (was Re: Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?)) Dan Brickley
• HELP (was Re: Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?)) pat hayes
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? pat hayes
• Re: rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please pat hayes
• quick comment on typed literals pat hayes
• MT editors draft pat hayes
• Re: access to MT editors version pat hayes

Wednesday, 6 November 2002

• Re: access to MT editors version Jos De_Roo
• Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?) Dan Brickley
• Re: Primer reference in the Concepts doc Graham Klyne
• rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please Dan Brickley
• RDFS 'vs' DTDs: types of things, types of xml documents (was Re: RDF vs the rest of the world (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Re: covering RDF applications in Primer Frank Manola
• access to MT editors version pat hayes
• Re: covering RDF applications in Primer Dan Connolly
• Re: covering RDF applications in Primer Brian McBride
• covering RDF applications in Primer Frank Manola
• Syntax doc references Frank Manola
• Primer reference in the Concepts doc Frank Manola
• Re: Primer draft review - syntax section Frank Manola
• MITRE email will be out this weekend by way of
• with attachment this time [was thumbs up (with caveats) to primer] Brian McBride
• Primer draft review - syntax section Dave Beckett
• thumbs up (with caveats) to primer Brian McBride
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• xml"foo" is dead Dave Beckett
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Patrick Stickler
• Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? Brian McBride
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Brian McBride
• Re: literal strings are what, exactly?? Dan Connolly
• Re: Primer synch with other documents pat hayes
• Re: Primer synch with other documents Frank Manola
• literal strings are what, exactly?? pat hayes
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? Frank Manola
• Re: Primer synch with other documents pat hayes
• RE: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? pat hayes
• Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? pat hayes
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? Dan Connolly
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? Frank Manola

Tuesday, 5 November 2002

• Re: rdfs:Datatype question pat hayes
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question pat hayes
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question pat hayes
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? Dan Connolly
• delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? Frank Manola
• Status of this Document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) Aaron Swartz
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) Jan Grant
• fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) Aaron Swartz
• fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) Aaron Swartz
• more primer comments Brian McBride
• Re: comments on primer so far Dan Connolly
• FYI: RDF does not believe in same-document references Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? Jos De_Roo
• RE: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Primer synch with other documents Graham Klyne
• Re: Concepts document example Graham Klyne
• Re: comments on primer so far Brian McBride
• Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? Jos De_Roo
• Re: comments on primer so far Frank Manola
• Re: Primer synch with other documents Frank Manola
• Re: comments on primer so far Patrick Stickler
• Re: comments on primer so far Frank Manola
• Re: comments on primer so far Frank Manola
• how to widen the Primer audience Frank Manola
• Re: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note Jan Grant
• Re: Primer synch with other documents Dave Beckett
• RE: Primer synch with other documents Jeremy Carroll
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference Jeremy Carroll
• Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference Brian McBride
• Re: comments on primer so far Brian McBride
• Re: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note Brian McBride
• MUST FIX [was Re: Concepts document example] Brian McBride
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference Patrick Stickler
• Re: comments on primer so far Dan Connolly
• rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note Aaron Swartz
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference Aaron Swartz
• Re: comments on primer so far Frank Manola

Monday, 4 November 2002

• Concepts document example Frank Manola
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference Dan Connolly
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference Brian McBride
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference Dan Connolly
• Re: Review of Datatyping content in Primer Brian McBride
• docsync: RDF URI Reference Brian McBride
• Re: Review of Datatyping content in Primer Frank Manola
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things Dan Connolly
• Re: comments on primer so far Brian McBride
• Re: comments on primer so far Frank Manola
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things Brian McBride
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? Brian McBride
• Re: comments on primer so far Brian McBride
• Primer synch with other documents Frank Manola
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things Graham Klyne
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things Graham Klyne
• Re: comments on primer so far Frank Manola
• comments on primer so far Brian McBride
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Graham Klyne
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Henry S. Thompson
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? Patrick Stickler
• Review of Datatyping content in Primer Patrick Stickler
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? Jos De_Roo
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Patrick Stickler
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Patrick Stickler
• Re: Minutes of RDF Core Telcon 2002-11-01 Jos De_Roo
• danbri out monday (dental ickyness) (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Jos De_Roo

Sunday, 3 November 2002

• Minutes of RDF Core Telcon 2002-11-01 Dave Beckett
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Feedback request Jeremy Carroll
• A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Graham Klyne
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Graham Klyne

Saturday, 2 November 2002

• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Brian McBride
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question Patrick Stickler
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Patrick Stickler
• rdfs:Datatype question pat hayes

Friday, 1 November 2002

• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Feedback request Jos De_Roo
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Tim Berners-Lee
• Fwd: Member Survey: Encourage WG/IGs to encourage AC Reps to complete it Brian McBride
• Re: Feedback request Graham Klyne
• Re: more feedback Graham Klyne
• Re: Feedback request Frank Manola
• Re: Feedback request pat hayes
• Re: Feedback request pat hayes
• Re: more feedback Dan Connolly
• Re: more feedback Brian McBride
• Re: new Primer version for review Frank Manola
• Re: Feedback request pat hayes
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Graham Klyne
• Re: more feedback Graham Klyne
• Re: new Primer version for review Graham Klyne
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Graham Klyne
• Re: Feedback request Graham Klyne
• road to publish concepts document Eric Miller
• not a test case. (was: Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases) pat hayes
• Re: more feedback Dan Connolly
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) Dan Connolly
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) pat hayes
• Summary of changes to 2002-10-24 RDF XML Syntax WD draft Dave Beckett
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Brian McBride
• Correction Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Feedback request Frank Manola
• Re: Feedback request Frank Manola
• Re: Feedback request Dave Beckett
• Re: Syntax doc comments Dave Beckett
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Brian McBride
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) Brian McBride
• Re: more feedback Brian McBride
• Re: Feedback request Brian McBride
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Brian McBride
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Patrick Stickler
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Feedback request Patrick Stickler
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Patrick Stickler
• Re: Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda Patrick Stickler
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' Jeremy Carroll
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) Dan Connolly
• on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things Dan Connolly
• more feedback pat hayes

Last message date: Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:54:40 UTC