w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from June 2002 by date

Friday, 28 June 2002

• Re: literals, again. Patrick Stickler
• Re: literals, again. pat hayes
• Re: literals, again. Patrick Stickler
• Re: literals, again. pat hayes
• thoughts on new document Aaron Swartz
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 pat hayes
• Re: Proposal for closure of rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposal for closure of rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes Jos De_Roo
• Outline of the RDFCore documents Brian McBride
• Re: TEST: literals Jos De_Roo
• New RDF document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal for closure of rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes Brian McBride
• Re: TEST: literals Dave Beckett
• TEST: literals Jos De_Roo
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Brian McBride
• RE: MT RDFS closure rule bug? Jan Grant
• Proposal for closure of rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes Patrick Stickler
• Re: Agenda for telecon 2002-06-28 Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 Patrick Stickler
• Re: literals, again. Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 Dan Connolly
• Re: literals, again. Dan Connolly
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete pat hayes
• RE: MT RDFS closure rule bug? pat hayes
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 Dan Connolly
• RE: MT RDFS closure rule bug? pat hayes
• RE: Outline for new RDF document pat hayes
• Re: Outline for new RDF document pat hayes
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 pat hayes
• RE: MT RDFS closure rule bug? pat hayes

Thursday, 27 June 2002

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ kk@w3.org
• Re: literals, again. Graham Klyne
• literals, again. pat hayes
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 Dan Connolly
• Agenda for telecon 2002-06-28 Brian McBride
• RE: MT RDFS closure rule bug? Dan Connolly
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 Graham Klyne
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Brian McBride
• Re: datatypes message - draft 2 Patrick Stickler
• Re: Draft datatypes message Patrick Stickler
• Re: Draft datatypes message Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 26 June 2002

• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Fwd: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2 Dave Beckett
• Re: Fwd: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2 Dan Brickley
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue list Dan Brickley
• Fwd: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2 Brian McBride
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Brian McBride
• Re: Issue list Brian McBride
• datatypes message - draft 2 Brian McBride
• Re: Draft datatypes message Brian McBride
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Dan Connolly
• RE: Draft datatypes message Brian McBride
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Jan Grant
• RE: Draft datatypes message Brian McBride
• Re: Draft datatypes message Brian McBride
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Patrick Stickler
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Graham Klyne
• Re: Making progress R.V.Guha
• Issue list Graham Klyne
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Brian McBride
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Brian McBride
• Re: procedure for determining reserved vocab Brian McBride
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Brian McBride
• rdfms-syntax-incomplete Jeremy Carroll
• RE: MT RDFS closure rule bug? Jeremy Carroll
• RE: MT RDFS closure rule bug? Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Outline for new RDF document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Graham Klyne
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Graham Klyne
• Re: Making progress Patrick Stickler
• Re: Making progress Dan Brickley
• Re: Making progress Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 25 June 2002

• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? pat hayes
• Re: Outline for new RDF document pat hayes
• Re: Making progress Graham Klyne
• Re: literals, language, xml Graham Klyne
• Re: Making progress R.V.Guha
• Minutes of F2F Meeting 17/18 June 2002 Brian McBride
• Re: Making progress Jan Grant
• Making progress R.V.Guha
• literals, language, xml Jan Grant
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Graham Klyne
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Graham Klyne
• Re: Cannes entailment, a question: Jan Grant
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Jan Grant
• Re: MT RDFS closure rule bug? pat hayes
• Re: Cannes entailment, a question: pat hayes
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? pat hayes
• Re: Outline for new RDF document pat hayes
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Graham Klyne
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Patrick Stickler
• Syntax: id symbol expansion Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Jan Grant
• MT RDFS closure rule bug? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Cannes entailment, a question: Jan Grant
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Jan Grant
• Re: Cannes entailment, a question: pat hayes

Monday, 24 June 2002

• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? patrick hayes
• Update of new RDF document Graham Klyne
• apologies for 6/28 teleconference Frank Manola
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Eric Miller
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Graham Klyne
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Frank Manola
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Patrick Stickler
• RE: Outline for new RDF document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Outline for new RDF document Patrick Stickler
• Re: procedure for determining reserved vocab Patrick Stickler
• Re: procedure for determining reserved vocab Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 23 June 2002

• procedure for determining reserved vocab R.V.Guha
• Re: Draft datatypes message Patrick Stickler
• Re: Draft datatypes message Patrick Stickler
• Re: Draft datatypes message Patrick Stickler

Friday, 21 June 2002

• Re: Outline for new RDF document Frank Manola
• Re: Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Graham Klyne
• Re: datatyping unstaked Graham Klyne
• Outline for new RDF document Graham Klyne
• RE: Draft datatypes message Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Draft datatypes message Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Draft datatypes message Aaron Swartz
• Re: Draft datatypes message Dan Connolly
• Draft datatypes message Brian McBride
• no rdfcore teleconference scheduled for today 2002-06-21 Eric Miller
• regrets Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 20 June 2002

• Re: Regarding my recent post: inquiry.txt Patrick Stickler
• Re: Regarding my recent post: inquiry.txt Frank Manola
• Cannes entailment, a question: Jan Grant
• Regarding my recent post: inquiry.txt Patrick Stickler
• Relationships between terms, statements and schemas and proper application behavior Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 19 June 2002

• Re: from patrick: inquiry.txt Brian McBride
• <s,l,x>-literals considered harmless Jan Grant

Tuesday, 18 June 2002

• Dark triples, current closure / entailment rules, can someone clarify? Jan Grant
• Re: from patrick: inquiry.txt Dan Connolly
• from patrick: inquiry.txt Brian McBride
• aside notes re rdfms-assertion Dan Brickley
• from Patrick Brian McBride
• grahams rdfms-assertion text Brian McBride
• rdfs schema / namespace update Dan Brickley

Monday, 17 June 2002

• regrets Ronald Daniel
• [w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none> patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Sunday, 16 June 2002

• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Jeremy Carroll
• burned at the stake (was Re: datatyping unstaked) Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatyping unstaked Patrick Stickler
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary Patrick Stickler
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary Patrick Stickler
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 CQ3FGodB0zRUMuHJjOcbS ezgo@w3.org

Saturday, 15 June 2002

• Re: new semantics initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: new semantics initiative Dan Brickley
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary Jos De_Roo
• Re: Pre-F2F bar chat Jos De_Roo
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Brian McBride
• Pre-F2F bar chat Graham Klyne
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary patrick hayes
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative patrick hayes
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary patrick hayes
• Re: datatyping unstaked patrick hayes
• Re: datatyping unstaked patrick hayes
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary patrick hayes

Friday, 14 June 2002

• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative patrick hayes
• Re: new semantics initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics patrick hayes
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative patrick hayes
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Dan Connolly
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative patrick hayes
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Jan Grant
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Dan Brickley
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics patrick hayes
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative patrick hayes
• belated regrets patrick hayes
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary Dan Connolly
• Re: datatyping unstaked Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore Telecon 2002-06-14 Mike Dean
• Re: datatyping unstaked Graham Klyne
• RE: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Graham Klyne
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Graham Klyne
• datatyping unstaked patrick hayes
• Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary Jonathan Borden
• Agenda for RDFCore Telecon 2002-06-14 Eric Miller
• the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary patrick hayes

Thursday, 13 June 2002

• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Jos De_Roo
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Frank Manola
• RE: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Ronald Daniel
• Issue list status Brian McBride
• Re: new semantics initiative Brian McBride
• Re: new semantics initiative Brian McBride
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Brian McBride
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: Issue faq-html-compliance Patrick Stickler
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Dan Brickley
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: namespaces as punctuation, was: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 12 June 2002

• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Frank Manola
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Dan Connolly
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Jos De_Roo
• Re: Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative R.V.Guha
• Issue faq-html-compliance Dave Beckett
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Dan Brickley
• weekly call for agenda items Eric Miller
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Frank Manola
• Re: new semantics initiative Dave Beckett
• Summary and some analysis: New Semantics Initiative Brian McBride
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics patrick hayes
• Re: new semantics initiative Graham Klyne
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion patrick hayes
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: new semantics initiative R.V.Guha
• namespaces as punctuation, was: new semantics initiative Jonathan Borden
• Comments on new semantics initiative documents Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Jan Grant
• Re: new semantics initiative Dave Beckett
• Re: new semantics initiative Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative Dan Brickley
• Re: new semantics initiative patrick hayes
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion patrick hayes

Tuesday, 11 June 2002

• Re: new semantics initiative drafts R.V.Guha
• Re: new semantics initiative drafts Dan Brickley
• Re: new semantics initiative drafts R.V.Guha
• Re: new semantics initiative drafts Jos De_Roo
• Re: new semantics initiative drafts R.V.Guha
• Re: new semantics initiative drafts Jos De_Roo
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: new semantics initiative Brian McBride
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Graham Klyne
• Re: new semantics initiative Jan Grant
• Re: new semantics initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: new semantics initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: new semantics initiative Dan Brickley
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Brian McBride
• Re: new semantics initiative Brian McBride
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: new semantics initiative drafts patrick hayes
• new semantics initiative drafts R.V.Guha

Monday, 10 June 2002

• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Aaron Swartz
• Re: new semantics initiative R.V.Guha
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Eric Miller
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics patrick hayes
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Frank Manola
• Re: new semantics initiative Frank Manola
• Re: new semantics initiative Graham Klyne
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Graham Klyne

Sunday, 9 June 2002

• new semantics initiative patrick hayes

Monday, 10 June 2002

• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Eric Miller

Sunday, 9 June 2002

• Re: Datatypes at F2F Sergey Melnik

Saturday, 8 June 2002

• Re: rdf:Description & test cases Dave Beckett
• Re: rdf:Description & test cases Dave Beckett
• Re: rdf:Description & test cases Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 7 June 2002

• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-06-07 Dave Beckett
• Re: Datatypes at F2F Graham Klyne
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Graham Klyne
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Patrick Stickler
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Frank Manola
• Datatypes at F2F Patrick Stickler
• WebOnt WG response to RDF Schema Working Draft (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Re: refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Dan Brickley
• Re: f2f agenda Patrick Stickler
• Re: f2f agenda Jan Grant
• Re: f2f agenda Patrick Stickler
• Re: f2f agenda Mike Dean
• rdf:Description & test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets - and item 9 graph, Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-06-07 Jeremy Carroll
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-06-07 Eric Miller

Thursday, 6 June 2002

• session 8 changed Brian McBride
• Re: f2f agenda Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 5 June 2002

• Comments on datatyping draft Graham Klyne
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Core F2F Registration (regrets) Dan Connolly
• f2f agenda Brian McBride
• RDF Core F2F Registration Eric Miller
• weekly call for agenda items Eric Miller

Tuesday, 4 June 2002

• Re: Role of N-Triples (was Re: datatyping revised draft) Frank Manola
• Re: Role of N-Triples (was Re: datatyping revised draft) Graham Klyne
• Re: Role of N-Triples (was Re: datatyping revised draft) Patrick Stickler

Monday, 3 June 2002

• Re: Role of N-Triples (was Re: datatyping revised draft) Frank Manola
• Re: Role of N-Triples (was Re: datatyping revised draft) Patrick Stickler
• Role of N-Triples (was Re: datatyping revised draft) Frank Manola
• Re: f2f suggestions Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatyping revised draft Patrick Stickler
• f2f suggestions Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 2 June 2002

• Re: datatyping revised draft Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 1 June 2002

• Re: Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-31 Jos De_Roo
• datatyping revised draft patrick hayes

Last message date: Friday, 28 June 2002 12:50:47 UTC