w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from January 2002 by date

Friday, 1 February 2002

Re: Modeling untidiness in tidy graphs Pat Hayes
Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Modeling untidiness in tidy graphs Sergey Melnik

Thursday, 31 January 2002

Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-31 Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal Pat Hayes
Datatyping Summary V3 Brian McBride
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-31 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
RE: Datatyping Summary V2 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Frank Manola
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-01-24 Brian McBride
Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping Summary V2 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Brian McBride
Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

Re: Datatyping Summary Brian McBride

Thursday, 31 January 2002

Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Dave Beckett
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Agenda items for the f2f Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Patrick Stickler
Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary Dan Connolly
Re: Datatypes: forming an opinion Pat Hayes
Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary Frank Manola
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping: revised draft Graham Klyne
Re: FW: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik
Re: Agenda items for the f2f Dave Beckett
Datatypes and xml:lang Dave Beckett
Datatyping Summary V2 Brian McBride
Re: Datatyping Summary Dan Connolly
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-01-24 Eric Miller
Re: Datatyping: revised draft Sergey Melnik
Re: Datatyping Summary Brian McBride
Re: Agenda items for the f2f Dan Connolly
weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
RE: Model Theory draft + tidiness Pat Hayes
Revised MT document Pat Hayes
Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary Brian McBride
Re: http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html Pat Hayes
Model theory update (was: Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com) Pat Hayes
Agenda items for the f2f Brian McBride
Datatypes: forming an opinion Brian McBride
Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com Pat Hayes
Revised MT document Graham Klyne
Re: And another nit (http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html) Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary Dan Connolly
Re: Datatyping Summary Dan Connolly
RE: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Brian McBride
Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: FW: Datatyping Summary Brian McBride
RE: Datatyping Summary - test suite, 2nd attempt Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary - test suite, 2nd attempt Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping Summary jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
And another nit (http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html) Graham Klyne
RE: Datatyping Summary - test suite, 2nd attempt Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
RE: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datatyping Summary Martyn Horner
Re: Datatyping Summary Martyn Horner
Re: For untidiness ... Martyn Horner
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html Graham Klyne
Re: Can't live with TDL and untidy literals Martyn Horner
Retract test suite message Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
RE: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
Re: use/mention and reification Martyn Horner
Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 29 January 2002

Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
RE: Datatyping Summary Dan Connolly
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Datatyping desiderata (take 4) without embedded CSS Graham Klyne
FW: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
RE: Datatyping Summary Pat Hayes
Re: update to MT document Jeremy Carroll
RE: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
RE: Datatyping Summary Dan Connolly
RE: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
RE: Datatyping Summary Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
Re: update to MT document Graham Klyne
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary Patrick Stickler
Re: update to MT document Pat Hayes

Monday, 28 January 2002

Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Dan Connolly
Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping: revised draft Graham Klyne
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Graham Klyne
Re: update to MT document Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary Dan Connolly
Datatyping Summary Brian McBride
Re: update to MT document Graham Klyne
Re: update to MT document Dave Beckett
update to MT document Pat Hayes
Datatyping MT agreement Jeremy Carroll
Implementing S Jeremy Carroll
Re: relating S-A and S-B [was: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement] Patrick Stickler
Circumstance, provenance and partial knowledge Graham Klyne
For untidiness ... Jeremy Carroll
Actions 2002-01-18#7, 2002-01-18#8 Graham Klyne
relating S-A and S-B [was: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement] Dan Connolly
Monotonicity Jeremy Carroll
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Jeremy Carroll
Re: Can't live with S and tidy graphs Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping differences Patrick Stickler
Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping differences Dan Connolly
Can't live with S and tidy graphs Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping differences Dan Connolly
RE: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datatyping differences Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Dan Connolly
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping differences Dan Connolly
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Dan Connolly
Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Patrick Stickler
Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Patrick Stickler
RE: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Jeremy Carroll
Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping differences Patrick Stickler
Re: Can't live with TDL and untidy literals Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) Patrick Stickler
Re: Model Theory draft + tidiness Patrick Stickler
RE: TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) Jeremy Carroll
Re: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 27 January 2002

RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Graham Klyne

Monday, 28 January 2002

Re: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping differences Patrick Stickler
TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 27 January 2002

RE: TDL Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Jeremy Carroll
RE: Model Theory draft + tidiness Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 26 January 2002

Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 25 January 2002

Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1 Dan Brickley
cannot work with reification proposal 1 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S Sergey Melnik
RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Dan Connolly
RE: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S Jeremy Carroll
RE: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S Jeremy Carroll
Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S Sergey Melnik
RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Jeremy Carroll
Re: primer update Frank Manola
primer update Brian McBride
Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Re: Datatyping differences Dan Connolly
RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Jeremy Carroll
Re: TDL Model Theory Patrick Stickler
Why I cannot live with S Patrick Stickler
Can't live with TDL and untidy literals Sergey Melnik
RE: TDL Model Theory Graham Klyne
Datatyping desiderata, take 4 Graham Klyne
RE: TDL Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement Dan Connolly
Re: TDL Model Theory Pat Hayes
Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification Dan Connolly
Re: TDL Model Theory Patrick Stickler
RE: TDL Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
Re: use/mention and reification Martyn Horner
Datatyping differences Jeremy Carroll
RE: TDL Model Theory Graham Klyne
Re: TDL Model Theory Graham Klyne
Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: Test cases for proposal: unrecognized attributes in the xml namespace should be ignored. Graham Klyne
Re: DATATYPING: second draft Graham Klyne
Re: direct CVS access to W3C site Eric Miller
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Final draft of TDL proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Brian McBride
Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: use/mention and reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: No model theory for reification? Patrick Stickler
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-25 Patrick Stickler
Re: DATATYPING: second draft Patrick Stickler
Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: use/mention and reification Brian McBride
Re: use/mention and reification Pat Hayes
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Brickley
Re: use/mention and reification Pat Hayes
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Connolly
Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification Dan Connolly

Thursday, 24 January 2002

Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-25 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
RE: No model theory for reification? Pat Hayes
Re: DATATYPING: second draft Pat Hayes
direct CVS access to W3C site Brian McBride
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: TAG issues during technical plenary Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL Model Theory Patrick Stickler
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Patrick Stickler
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Dan Connolly
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: TDL Model Theory Patrick Stickler
Issue mime-types-for-rdf-docs Dave Beckett
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Martyn Horner
RE: TDL Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
Test cases for proposal: unrecognized attributes in the xml namespace should be ignored. Dave Beckett
Re: TDL Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
Re: use/mention and reification Martyn Horner
Re: review MT draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Graham Klyne
Thoughts on Reification: was: Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Re: review MT draft Brian McBride
Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Sergey Melnik
Re: use/mention and reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Re: use/mention and reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Wednesday, 23 January 2002

Re: TDL Model Theory Graham Klyne
Re: TDL Model Theory Graham Klyne
Re: TDL Model Theory Pat Hayes
Re: TAG issues during technical plenary Pat Hayes
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Brickley
Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Re: TDL Model Theory Patrick Stickler
TDL Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Re: TAG issues during technical plenary Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Connolly
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary Graham Klyne
Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Patrick Stickler
Re: Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Pat Hayes
Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping Graham Klyne
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Pat Hayes
Re: Review of 14-Dec-2001 RDF model theory document Pat Hayes
Re: use/mention and reification Frank Manola
Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Brickley
Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: TAG issues during technical plenary Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Brickley
Re: use/mention and reification Patrick Stickler

Monday, 21 January 2002

Re: review MT draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping Graham Klyne
Re: review MT draft Brian McBride
RE: Missing messages Jeremy Carroll
Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary Brian McBride
Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Brickley
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Connolly
Re: Missing messages jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: review MT draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Missing messages Brian McBride
Re: review MT draft Brian McBride
Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: use/mention and reification Dan Brickley
Re: review MT draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: use/mention and reification Graham Klyne
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Jan Grant
Re: use/mention and reification Jan Grant
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Graham Klyne
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping desiderata - take 3 Graham Klyne

Saturday, 19 January 2002

Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Patrick Stickler
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Patrick Stickler
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Patrick Stickler
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Patrick Stickler
Re: Missing messages Patrick Stickler
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Sergey Melnik
Re: review MT draft Pat Hayes
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Pat Hayes
Re: review MT draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Sergey Melnik
literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) Pat Hayes

Friday, 18 January 2002

Re: review MT draft Pat Hayes

Saturday, 19 January 2002

Re: Datatyping desiderata - take 3 Sergey Melnik

Friday, 18 January 2002

Datatyping: revised draft Sergey Melnik
use/mention and reification Dan Connolly
Re: Missing messages jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: review MT draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Graham Klyne
Missing messages Graham Klyne
Telecon 2002-01-18 minutes Graham Klyne
Re: xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Pat Hayes
MT containing containers Pat Hayes
Re: Review of MT Pat Hayes
Re: Review of MT Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions Patrick Stickler
Re: Review of MT Pat Hayes
Re: Review of MT Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping desiderata - take 3 Patrick Stickler
xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions Dan Brickley
Re: review MT draft Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Graham Klyne
Datatyping desiderata - take 3 Graham Klyne
Re: Review of MT Brian McBride
Re: Review of MT Brian McBride
Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base Jeremy Carroll
Re: Review of MT Patrick Stickler
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-18 Patrick Stickler
Review of MT Patrick Stickler
Re: Problem with TDL (NOT) Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Patrick Stickler
Problem with TDL Sergey Melnik
review MT draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 17 January 2002

Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Graham Klyne
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-18 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
apologies for 2002-01-18 telecon Frank Manola
Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs Brian McBride
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Martyn Horner
Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs Martyn Horner

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

Preview of working draft for TLD (PD) datatyping scheme proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Patrick Stickler
Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 15 January 2002

Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Patrick Stickler
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Dave Beckett
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs Dave Beckett
Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Graham Klyne
Datatyping desiderata, take 2 Graham Klyne
Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Graham Klyne
Fwd: Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Graham Klyne
Extracted/Tweaked Datatyping "foundation" document Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Document Partitioning Patrick Stickler
Datatyping Document Partitioning Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Patrick Stickler

Monday, 14 January 2002

ACTION: 2002-01-11#9, done Graham Klyne
Action 2002-01-11#3 reification issue Brian McBride
ACTION 2002-01-11#5 done Dave Beckett
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base Dave Beckett
Re: RDF Core telecon 2002-01-11 draft minutes Brian McBride
ACTION re: Review test cases on para 196 Dave Beckett
RDF Core telecon 2002-01-11 draft minutes Jan Grant
Review of MT Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 13 January 2002

RE: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Graham Klyne

Friday, 11 January 2002

RE: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Jeremy Carroll
RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) Graham Klyne
Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B Graham Klyne
Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B Patrick Stickler
Diagrams showing Cohabitation of P and D Idioms per PD Model Patrick Stickler
Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B Graham Klyne
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Patrick Stickler
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Mike Dean
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Co-existence Patrick Stickler
Re: On the elegance of P/P+ Patrick Stickler
Co-existence Jeremy Carroll
RE: On the elegance of P/P+ Jeremy Carroll
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Brian McBride
On the elegance of P/P+ Patrick Stickler
Diagrams for PDU Interpretation of S/A and S/B idioms Patrick Stickler
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Frank Manola
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping Jan Grant
Diagrams for PDU "Pairing" Data Type Model and Interpretation of P/P+/D/U idioms Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
RE: RDF datatyping Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF datatyping Jan Grant
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
RE: RDF datatyping Jan Grant
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Brian McBride
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Patrick Stickler
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
Clarification about recent terminology Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
Re: No model theory for reification? Patrick Stickler
Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B Patrick Stickler
RE: RDF datatyping Graham Klyne

Thursday, 10 January 2002

Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Graham Klyne
Re: No model theory for reification? Graham Klyne
RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF datatyping Graham Klyne
Re: No model theory for reification? Graham Klyne
RE: RDF datatyping Jeremy Carroll
Re: No model theory for reification? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B Brian McBride
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
RE: No model theory for reification? Jeremy Carroll
RE: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B Patrick Stickler
Re: No model theory for reification? Dan Brickley
Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jan Grant
RE: not-id-and-resource-attr Jan Grant
No model theory for reification? Jeremy Carroll
RE: not-id-and-resource-attr Jan Grant
RE: not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
RE: not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler
Re: weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
RE: not-id-and-resource-attr & bagID Jeremy Carroll
Re: not-id-and-resource-attr Jan Grant
Joint Committee response regarding datatyping Mike Dean
Comments/questions on latest draft of Sergey's Datatyping spec Patrick Stickler
Re: weekly call for agenda items Graham Klyne
RE: RDF datatyping Jeremy Carroll
RE: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF datatyping Graham Klyne
Re: weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF datatyping Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value Aaron Swartz
Re: weekly call for agenda items Graham Klyne
Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Graham Klyne
weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Brian McBride
Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Graham Klyne
Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-reification-required Dave Beckett
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping Dave Beckett
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value Dave Beckett

Monday, 7 January 2002

RDF datatyping Graham Klyne
Fwd: Reminder: Jan 10: W3C I18N Workshop deadline Brian McBride

Sunday, 6 January 2002

Re: Question about S Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 3 January 2002

Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) Frank Manola
Primer - some comments Graham Klyne
Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) Graham Klyne
Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) Eric Miller
Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) Graham Klyne
Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) Frank Manola
US spelling serialization (sic) Graham Klyne
Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Graham Klyne
Re: DATATYPING: second draft Graham Klyne
RE: Question about S Graham Klyne
RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 2 January 2002

Review of 14-Dec-2001 RDF model theory document Graham Klyne

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 20:32:00 UTC