Re: domain of rdfs:member

* Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2002-12-23 17:08+0000]
> 
> I'm working on the schema doc.  I've just removed the statement that the 
> domain of rdfs:member is rdf:Container on the grounds I couldn't find it in 
> the MT and I remember us deciding there was no domain for the property (I 
> think).
> 
> This message is to check that I'm right.

You're right. We didn't want :r1 rdf:_1 "blah" to imply that :r1 was a 
container, since we wanted to allow the _n properties to be used on 
things that weren't containers. Saying that they are all specializations of a 
property with a domain of Container woudl mess that up (I assume there's 
a bit of the MT that fleshes this out).

Dan

Received on Monday, 23 December 2002 15:03:22 UTC