- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:58:41 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>2002-11-22#1 janG ensure test cases themselves are named using frag IDs > >2002-11-22#2 jang [test case fix] remove RDFS entailment rules >from the language-ignored-for-numeric-types cases. > >2002-11-22#3 patH Tie MT datatype to the sec that points out >language isn't important to DT entailment (except for rdf:XMLLiteral) Ive added the following paragraph to the section on datatype interpretations in the Semantics doc. (I realized that the current text was not actually accurate, since it said that the generic datatype conditions applied to rdf:XMLLiteral as well as all the others, so Ive tweaked that.) Now, further to the above, what exactly should I link it to??? -------- The semantic conditions for the built-in datatype rdf:XMLLiteral have been described in previous sections; but in a datatyped interpretation, in addition, a graph which contains a literal with a non-well-formed XML string or an illegal language tag, and which is typed with rdf:XMLLiteral is always considered a datatype violation. These semantic conditions are exactly similar to [those for other datatypes] if one defines the lexical space of rdf:XMLLiteral as the set all XML documents and all pairs of XML documents and language tags, and L2V(I(rdf:XMLLiteral)) as XML canonicalization. The possible inclusion of language tags makes this a special case, however: in all other cases, RDF ignores any language tags which occur in typed literals. -------- Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 15:58:46 UTC